Topic on Talk:Qualitipedia

Even if I wasn't really betrayed, I truly felt betrayed. I had good reasons to defend the reception wikis, since many of their articles actually provide fair criticism and many opinionated pages have been deleted by the admins and those problematic admins have left wikipedia months ago.

They decided to close Qualitipedia because of problems that happened like one year ago and yet the admins weren't responsible enough to take care of the wikis, I lost those who were the closest thing I have to friends, this feels like Revenge of the Sith, except those who turned into the dark side were the former admins, they started to ignore the good qualities of the wikis and treated me like trash, I tought I was able to solve a problem with words, but no, they failed to me.

In recent years web reviews have became more reliable than professional critics, sometimes critics can bash media for stupid reasons like for example Godzilla: King of the Monsters was criticized by critics for having too much scenes with monsters yet audiences loved the film. Sometimes media (not just films) can have different reception between critics and audiences, and audiences are much more trustworthy compared to critics at times (through web reviewers can be also biased at times).

I planned to restore pages about people in the reception wikis (both the positive and the negative) since plenty of them were actually pretty good and gave fair criticism to them, also because some celebrities do a lot of unethical things that deserve to be criticized. I also wanted to restore some of the pages that were deleted in RWW since they were actually good.

I regret making a RfC to resotre the Website Reception Wikis since nearly everyone has failed to me, I should have discussed this with FatBurn0000. If you are reading this FatBurn, please gave me the database dumps of the website reception wikis.