Topic on Talk:Qualitipedia

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About Controversial Media Wiki

10
Moisty (talkcontribs)

I have this wiki called controversial media wiki and it talks about controversial media. I was wondering if it could be added to Qualitipedia.

Raidarr (talkcontribs)

It's marked as inactive with nothing really there, but in principle I like the idea of a wiki for that sort of thing.

Moisty (talkcontribs)

Really? So can we work something out?

Raidarr (talkcontribs)

You would have to discuss it with User:DarkMatterMan4500 and/or other current bureaucrats, whenever they'd like to comment. We don't have a true 'joining qualitipedia' policy yet, beyond getting in touch with them.

DarkMatterMan4500 (talkcontribs)

Hmmm, as long as they don't break the Code of Conduct or Content Policies, I'm all ears.

Moisty (talkcontribs)

Oh my god!! Really? Thank you so much. Where should I start?

Raidarr (talkcontribs)

To make it part of QP you could add DarkMatterMan and Blazikeye as bureaucrats, given they are leader and co-leader respectively. I guess it's up to them from there to QPify it, unless you have other ideas to make it fit.

Moisty (talkcontribs)

Alright, that’s fine! As long as I am still the creator, they can be bureaucrats! Just whenever he’s ready.

Raidarr (talkcontribs)

This does raise a question for QP as far as trust; I don't mean for all of QP, but for each QP wiki if people 'founding it' are trustworthy to be (ideally permanent) bureaucrats on QP for that place. Considering just founding a wiki and getting it approved makes it easy to get at least one slot of absolute power since founders expect to have those powers even if they join QP, where they otherwise wouldn't.

Moisty (talkcontribs)

Alright, thanks.