Talk:Qualitipedia

Raise any issues, suggestions or concerns about Qualitipedia here! You may also create a blog if you prefer. Keep in mind that certain high-profile issues may be directed to a special page or blog to be focused, and that official polls and 'final' discussions may be done on a staff blog.

Feel free to use a local talk page (Discussion tab) to discuss any page or policy in particular. We will catch up to it.

This is the first time we actually use our meta wiki. After some drama (we will not say who caused it because it would be gravedigging), we removed the person's logos after we found out they ripped off MatPat's profile pictures. I'm currently making my own logos, but so far only the CGW and AGW logos have been made so far. Since I was busy with some other stuff, I only made these two logos and moved along with some other stuff. I will be making my own logos as time goes on. Here are my logos (I already have the vectors in my hard drive, but I'm uploading them here as PNG for people using old-as-shit browsers):

-

Kinda generic, But decent enough. But What happen if i still have the CSS glitch in CGW?

I made my own version of the TTSW logo, looks good isn't it?

I think there can be more differences between logos,like the controller on the Crappy Games Wiki’s logo being broken

those look cool

Pretty good.

Also, a bit of an oversight so I'm mentioning this: this is also supposed to be a place where people can submit their own logos.

Maybe an image of Bubsy or a big rig on the CGW logo, and Mario or Sonic on the AGW logo.

Good idea. The CGW logo I made had Bubsy, and my AGW logo had Mario. Mario's wordmark can remain.

I like them

I think there should be a common design. My suggestion is to make it based off the MediaWiki logo with two square brackets surrounding the icon. Also, there will be a caption in the Graphik font showing the name of the wiki.

Neat.

My contenders. Inspired by FreezingTNT's ones and by Qualitipedia banners. Note these are prototypes.

Going to have get rid of the panel for Characters wiki.

My contender is now outdated.

How did you upload an image?

I like them

Clockwise from TL: Games, Books, Movies, Websites, Toys, Music, Characters, Televised Media

You are right!. Anyways, this logo lacks icons.

I want to make a mix of FreezingTNT's logos and the MediaWiki logo. There will be three petals for each wiki, because there are 24 petals in the logo, with square brackets surrounding the sunflower. The wiki's icon would be located on the disk (the circle surrounded by the petals). I will use the same colors as NJPet's proposal.

better logo then the one right now

Plagiarized? The guy who made them literally said inspired

Here's my logo to "Awesome games wiki":

The reason why it is not shaded is to make AGW if set to dark mode look awesome.

Tbh, QP should try out logos that don't try to shove the text in. Minus text they tend to look quite decent as-is. With, not so much.

Still sleeping, still sleeping................

Hi.

I know it's bad, low-quality and not transparent, but anyways

@Oofas That is very good. I really like that one.

Yeah, that's nice-looking.

I one for CGW.

Same with TTSW (not this one, the bottom one)

Same with TTSW

An AGW one

Actually, now that we have only seven wiki sets now (The character wikis will be reopened if the community agrees, but will not be part of Qualitipedia), I think we should go back to using FreezingTNT's designs.

The only reason why FreezingTNT's designs were retired was because MarioMario456 blocked him and Mario couldn't tolerate his hard work for designing the logos. He decided to make unprofessional logos that rip off MatPat's profile pictures, and he decided to make Qualitipedia's logo a rainbow, which has nothing to do with the agenda of the network, which is to review entertainment (websites, games, home and handheld consoles, movies, TV shows, TV show episodes, literature, game developers, entertainment companies and game developers) and categorize them into negative and positive reception.

Yeah, I agree with you, despite the person's logos ripping-off MatPat's ones.

Hello. So, I made a logo for Crappy Games Wiki, and Awesome Games Wiki. Sorry, if it sucks, and/or Someone already made it.

This would be the official logo of the CGW and AGW wikis now.

I think you're on a better track in shape and idea. I would say the problem is; too detailed. There is no sense of contrast. Logos are not about being detailed or artistic, instead memorable. And I don't get why they feel the need to include the text every time. Logos should stand on their own without it, as that is what they are for.

Oh, Okay. How about this one? You might like it.

I actually wanna remove the touchpad as well. But, When I removed it, It looks too boring to me, so I decided to add it back. If it's still too detailed, I'm sorry but this is as far as I can go.

Now this looks great! I like it a lot!

This would be the official logo of the CGW and AGW wikis now.

My logo for ARD

The small text is no good, without it I'd call this acceptable in white text on the blue background.

Make it bigger?

I can't I'm making a peta logo parody

I don't like the small text. It doesn't look right.

Again, I'm trying to make a PETA logo parody Upload me a blank template

I did my own best on doing my new TTSW and BTSW logos.