TigerBlazer's board
I may create a new account at some point using a burner email for the discord server.
Ok. I thought you were leaving though.
Hey, Tiger, if you're still active on this wiki: QPGames is down. I don't know how long it'll be down, but right now, I can't go there at all.
Well, after I leave QP again, I may or may not have something planned to return to the internet again. I won't say what it is, but it definitely doesn't involve coming back to QP.
Thanks for giving me the rights there. I do plan on checking ut out every once and a while before my 2nd retirement.
I like your idea, but why make the wiki private? Also, about Discord, I might not have an account there because I plan to cut ties with Qualitipedia a second time and once that happens, I won't be coming back.
Well if they're on board with it, I'm on board with it.
Interesting. Have you talked with the other proposed staff members about this?
Alright, I'll see them for myself.
I'm sorry, but there is no glossing that over Tiger. It's the truth.
"Dude, I have already heard you, but we didn't start that trend. Millions of other people define that, so it's going to stay that way here, especially after many have ruined media and threatened entertainment. Sorry."
With all due respect Tiger, I am not assuming that you all have, but it all shouldn't have to be this way on the internet, nor in real life. I made it clear that if a professional had compared both the regressive left and social justice (especially the SJW term) in general, and having them go through definition tests and see what traits survive and which don't. How most if not all modern age people, interpret the traits of social justice and social justice warriors, is that they will fail, and be actually part of the regressive left, as opposed to SJWs.
Only an unprofessional, reckless, dishonest jackass would negatively define positive things as the norm, and that's something a demagogue/rabble-rouser would do, which they likely are. Social media is obviously a dangerous social experiment, as well as media platforms, and that's something we all need to accept until they are fixed by Jared.
RE:This Needs to Be Done
To be quite honest with you Tiger, the real problem actually, is not the issue we are making pointers in regards to political views, there's no problem that we can discuss the issues it causes, at least when directly tied to the subject of the wiki at hand, as well as a corporation's reputation. But the ways we went about it are wrong and overall, simply biased and opinionated, that's what the deal is. In truth, all wikis are not meant to be opinionated and based on bias, and never have been. This is what makes a wiki quite unenjoyable, and toxic, and this is truly how the critic wikis operate. If this were to be applied with all wikis, then that's their own downfall. So instead of operating the wikis in subjective, biased, and opinionated ways like smearing companies and individuals, we should only instead, operate in an objective, unbiased, and in professional way. And that's the importance of what wikis should be about.
But I am pretty much fed up with this demagoguery-based narrative, that SJWs are corrupt individuals, when the word is constructed to be a positive one from the start. In reality, the sort of select people we are really dealing with, is the regressive left. Big difference. I have already made that clear, and we wouldn't be in this day and age if certain select people, take their own liberties to define anything they see fit, regardless of the consequences. A professional/expert can pretty much test the negative traits of a positive word, with the traits being unable to survive a definition test, whereas the regressive left term, is an entirely opposite story. Not only that, but they would've made it bluntly clear, that defining words like that, is not just disingenuous, but also misleading, fraudulent, and also demagogueish by nature.