SuperStreetKombat's board
Is truly dissapointing what you did, you were like my idol, you used to be a great person but then you turned many of my friends into the dark side, our relationship is kinda like Obi-Wan Kenobi with Anakin Skywalker as we used to be like friends but now we are enemies.
I will never forgive what you did on September of this year!.
Well I got banned by a Abuse filter for trying to edit a Page on South Park Calling HumancentiPad the second worst episode of South Park (Something that people have already done before. I rule they say I was banned for was Anti-LTA #2 but I swear I did nothing wrong. But If I did I just want to say I am very sorry And I wish to never repeat these events again.
Hi It is me Andrewgtv05 and I want to complain about my ban on the best shows wiki. Why did you decide to ban me after one mistake? I thought it took 5 strikes to get you permanently banned. Not one. So why? Because I was being abusive. No I was not. I simply expressed an opinion that most people agree on. But not only did you have to ban me. You had to ban me permanently because of one screw up. Couldn’t you just gave me a warning instead. That would have been much easier then just blocking me for life.
A comment from the user Rockman138 in this article should be deleted: https://terribletvshows.miraheze.org/wiki/Bill_Nye_Saves_the_World Reason: what he said was very immature and makes us look bad, I hate SJWs but saying such things doesn't make you look any better. I wonder if this user even got banned for his actions.
It had to do with the fact that the topic was locked up by Raidarr, and it was advised for the topic to not be re-opened.
Hii, don't forget to cast your vote in this Request for Comments! Thanks for your cooperation pal.
I may have been a bit curious. That might have been the reason why.
I may have been a bit curious. That might have been the reason why.
Ah, found what you mean. I referenced 'QP wide ban' because in previous administrations a less patient bureaucrat would have likely done so. However, I do consider it an inappropriate response.
I would say Moisty is a very borderline case. I don't hold QP to a different username standard than globally, and globally I would let it pass. I tend not to like striking people for Username Policy unless it's necessary or directly contradicts a line. If you like though, I can confer with a colleague about it and see if a change is needed. I'm not in favor though.