Search results

...s to sound like a moral guardian and I understand that these wikis are for 13+, however my reason is simple: The wiki should be renamed incase a kid-frie # {{Oppose|Strongest}} This wiki is intended for people aged 13 or older, so the name is just fine. [[User:TigerBlazer|TigerBlazer]] ([[Use

...subsequent RfC. --[[User:Raidarr|Raidarr]] ([[User talk:Raidarr|talk]]) 13:13, 6 January 2022 (UTC) | }} ....</s> [[User:FatBurn0000|FatBurn0000]] ([[User talk:FatBurn0000|talk]]) 01:13, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

...ible wiki closure. --[[User:Raidarr|Raidarr]] ([[User talk:Raidarr|talk]]) 13:52, 24 May 2022 (UTC) ...:Reviweing97Shows|Reviweing97Shows]] ([[User talk:Reviweing97Shows|talk]]) 13:43, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

...to manage. One more thing to mention is that they can be used to test out technical changes and ideas to see how those ideas and changes play out. --[[User:Bla #*The literature wikis are the only low-traffic option we have to test technical ideas and implementation before putting them into larger wikis. I know a lo

...ey work. This applies for all rules in CGW's 'Content' section except for #13, which should be moved to 'Conduct' instead (explained in the next sub-chan #Rewrite of Content's #13: We offer user pages, blogs and comments to express yourself and your opini

...cally feasible. --[[User:Raidarr|Raidarr]] ([[User talk:Raidarr|talk]]) 13:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC) | ...he Recent changes section. [[User:NJPet|NJPet]] ([[User talk:NJPet|talk]]) 13:40, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

...nt and if what you say is true, if you have the will to complete all those technical tasks as bureaucrat, then I'm all for it. {{ZanglerSignature}} 20:26, 12 Au ...andbox]] | [[mh:meta:Special:CentralAuth/FatBurn0000|CentralAuth]]) 03:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

:*You must be at least 13 to register and contribute. ...ain page of the wiki can be used to ask about the wiki's topic in general, technical support, etc. Otherwise discussions should be related to page contents. You