Comments log

This is a log of comments.

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

• 00:19, 5 March 2022 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Why I think the "downvoting comments" rule should be limited (It still applies to TSAEW and DLW.)
• 00:08, 5 March 2022 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Why I think the "downvoting comments" rule should be limited (I don't remember anything related to that. Also, how is it controversial?)
• 13:42, 4 March 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (p much what raidarr says. expect downvotes on hot take-type things or with poor elaboration. it's not """FACTS""" when u give an empty statement. besides u counted yourself into the toxicity group so, go figure, shrug)
• 13:36, 4 March 2022 Moisty talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (Sadly, it feels like everyone expects the inverse.)
• 09:47, 4 March 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (From what I see Robert, your most downvoted comment is the one you made a sweeping statement with that you failed to substantiate further. The comment reply chain is bizarre, apologies if this is not in the right place.)
• 09:46, 4 March 2022 Raidarr talk contribs deleted comment #1322 on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation
• 09:45, 4 March 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (From what I see, your most downvoted comment is the one you made a sweeping statement with that you failed to substantiate further.)
• 09:43, 4 March 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Why I think the "downvoting comments" rule should be limited (SSK is correct, the rule is defunct; please let me know which wikis perpetuate it. I've been meaning to update the behind wikis with rules, but between a bit of rule bloat setting in on the examples already (games wikis) and a thought for just changing how the system works to be central to this wiki and adjusting the 'forbidden pages' section to be more about scope, I simply haven't gotten to it. So this relic of policy may still be written, but it is not respected because it is impossible t...)
• 07:48, 4 March 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Why I think the "downvoting comments" rule should be limited (That rule against dowmvoting unpopular opinion comments is still a thing? Didn't we give that up a while ago because of how controversial it was?)
• 02:26, 4 March 2022 Robertoiglesias271 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (lul i got downvoted by ppl who can't accept the facts)
• 23:49, 3 March 2022 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Make staff be the only ones that can move pages (Who downvoted this comment?)
• 21:05, 3 March 2022 NJPet talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (Nobody's perfect, after all.)
• 20:15, 3 March 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Make staff be the only ones that can move pages (then you better put it on oppose with a good argument too)
• 15:49, 3 March 2022 John 127 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Make staff be the only ones that can move pages (i don't think only the admins should move pages.)
• 13:39, 3 March 2022 Moisty talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (I cannot lie, I am a very flawed human being.)
• 12:51, 3 March 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (Backed up with a proper difference, I'm inclined to see the apology accepted. But of course the better record has to be built up first.)
• 05:02, 3 March 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:TigerBlazer's Critique of the Current State of Qualitipedia (talking with qualitipedia haters be like "reception wikis are bad, i don't like them, miraheze should close them, fuck qualitipedia forever!!!" "whoa dude chill why so much hate" "no dude it's my opinion, see? you don't respect opinions, this proves qualitipedia can't take criticism >:(")
• 01:53, 3 March 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (Thanks for understanding.)
• 01:52, 3 March 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs deleted comment #1310 on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis:
• 01:52, 3 March 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (Thank you ubderstanding.)
• 01:36, 3 March 2022 Moisty talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (I see.)
• 01:15, 3 March 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (this is not exclusive to you reaching out to weird places (which was obvious to be likely to not trolling), this was taking into account your past behaviour. i don't know your situation but regardless, since i personally don't know you and i don't intend to anyway, i'm naturally more inclined to just not accept your apology and just... move on. don't care if this is part of a major trolling or not, i'm just dropping my thoughts. i hope you understand)
• 00:40, 3 March 2022 Moisty talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (You gotta understand where I’m coming from this time. I reached out of help in a inappropriate place. Yes, that’s a bad decision, however it’s not like I was trolling. Yes, it was wrong, and I apologize, but if you’re ever in my situation, then you shall understand.)
• 23:18, 2 March 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (when you've done many transgresions, it doesn't work that way fam. nearly nobody will trust an instant apology from a repeated offender. it's definitively not the first time you're doing compromises to improve either, so all of this comes as empty to me. if you're being really genuine about it then sorry, it's hard to take you seriously anymore. now the only thing that can make me (and i'm sure most other users who hold it agaisnt you) change opinions about you is time, a long time.)
• 23:04, 2 March 2022 Moisty talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (I regret my decision and I will try to improve.)
• 23:02, 2 March 2022 Moisty talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (I apologize.)
• 22:48, 2 March 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (Moisty is a troll by nature and should be taken accordingly. The other issue seems to have taken place a rather long while back. Thus, this blog seems excessive in response to isolated issues that should be treated as such.)
• 21:55, 2 March 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (regardless, it was important to discuss but guess i'll have to digress. there's no need for a rule for the principle to be done anyway.)
• 21:45, 2 March 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (I actually regret making that RfC.)
• 21:23, 2 March 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (it's perfectly understandable the reason why you're doing this SSK. this reminds me of the [https://qualitipedia.miraheze.org/wiki/Requests_for_Comment/Make_a_rule_against_posting_comments,_blogs,_topics,_etc._about_suicide_or_depression_on_all_Qualitipedia_wikis | RfC you made] (@ everybody now see why it's important discussing this?) touching the general idea involved here, which i supported and i still stand by the statements i made there (find them at the second support). i hope it was li...)
• 21:20, 2 March 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs deleted comment #1299 on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis:
• 21:20, 2 March 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (it's perfectly understandable the reason why you're doing this SSK. this reminds me of the RfC you made (now see why it's important discussing this?) touching the general idea involved here, which i supported and i still stand by the statements i made there (find them at the second support). i hope it was that way, but...)
• 20:00, 2 March 2022 Moisty talk contribs deleted comment #1297 on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis:
• 19:59, 2 March 2022 King Dice talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (I'm sorry people are dragging you into bad situations. I promise that I'll try to not involve you in any of my problems unless is staff as a whole related.)
• 19:58, 2 March 2022 Moisty talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:An important message to everyone on all of the Reception Wikis: (I apologized, and I moved on, I’m sorry, I just don’t know what to do.)
• 01:14, 1 March 2022 Atomicstar talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating requests for deletion and restoration (Again, admins can't be responsible for improving every page that doesn't pass quality minimums.)
• 01:10, 1 March 2022 Atomicstar talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating requests for deletion and restoration (It's not good practice to have incomplete or poorly written pages in the mainspace, it just looks unprofessional. I might make a RFC for a draft space that may work better than sandbox.)
• 23:21, 28 February 2022 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (@John 127: I don't think it should be closed. Just because Duchess is retired and no longer contributes to reception wikis doesn't mean other users won't be interested, and it's a good idea for a wiki tbh.)
• 23:11, 28 February 2022 Marxo Grouch talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (It's clearly a wiki about a fake show made as a joke.)
• 22:57, 28 February 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: ("Speedy Grandma"?)
• 22:51, 28 February 2022 King Dice talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (May be he will not come back here anyway.)
• 21:35, 28 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (DarkMatterMan is considered 'first leader' by seniority and the legacy system that had him as first leader and any other as co-leader. In practice of course we do what we do and I tend to do my own thing, but that's the arrangement behind it. Suggestion for closure should be made on the local wiki in question, not on here or on Meta. Only when the discussion has taken place for some time should it go to the Stewards' noticeboard.)
• 21:24, 28 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (well, his global lock was self-requested. all that's needed for someone to lift a self-requested lock is talking to a steward, since it's you that wished to be locked after all so you have the rights over it. he came back volunteerly)
• 21:10, 28 February 2022 Marxo Grouch talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (Well that's… news. Never thought Duchess would have his account unlocked.)
• 20:47, 28 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: ([https://speedygrandma.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Speedy_Grandma_Wiki&type=revision&diff=792&oldid=784 are you sure about that])
• 20:16, 28 February 2022 Marxo Grouch talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (Highly unlikely since both users are globally locked.)
• 20:15, 28 February 2022 Marxo Grouch talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (The admin lists QP-wide rank him as co-leader.)
• 20:14, 28 February 2022 King Dice talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding wiki attention inequality ({{Quote|Crappy Games Wiki is treated that way because it was the first wiki made, as well as the one that gains more attention for other users. I get why you are mad, but there is a reason of why various users still treat is as the Central one.|King Dice in the "Please stop with this" blog by Blubabluba9990 at 15:23 (UTC) in January 23, 2022}})
• 19:21, 28 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (i wonder if those downvotes are duchess or spore)
• 19:20, 28 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (i thought raidarr was the leader technically, i mean he's been behind most fundamental changes now lol)

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)