Comments log

This is a log of comments.

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

• 02:17, 22 February 2022 MJ2003 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:In defense of merged wikis (I think the film and TV wikis within Qualitipedia should be merged into a new wiki called the "Entertainment Wiki".)
• 20:09, 21 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (I've somehow missed the youtuber entirely. Goes to show me I guess :p)
• 18:24, 21 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (just let the deviantart sheeps be, as long as it doesn't affect the overall reputation of the wikis, because even cleverbot can see the bullshit through them. it's the legitimate and genuine points that we have to adress. friendly reminder that some weeks ago we got a 300 thousand subs youtube channel (rerez) visiting the discord server to offer some corrections in the popeye page. that's the kind of audience we should be aiming for tbh, not a group of people that screams "qualitipedia trie...)
• 18:20, 21 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (I would say the off-site critique is either largely obsolete or has died down, as I've seen very, very little fresh material that isn't from the mid/earlier Duchess era. The commentary on Deviantart, YouTube and other places I know of has also died down. They still have impact and good SEO, but there's not much to be done aside from improving what people are looking at when they do their own research based on those articles and comments.)
• 18:12, 21 February 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (To be fair, the general quality of the wikis has improved during the Raidarr era. I am more worried about people off-site though. It does seem like the rants have died down recently.)
• 23:20, 20 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (satire, yeah)
• 21:51, 20 February 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (Yeah, that's my point. Why would they add those sections if they won't allow RW-style pointers anyway? Was it done for the sake of satire or something?)
• 21:40, 20 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (for a reason that appears in the same page and same headers. > "Bro, wtf are you doing? We’re not making this page like a reception wiki article. Oh, sorry." > "No, we aren’t making this the same as a reception wiki article. Do you understand? Sorry.")
• 20:58, 20 February 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (If that Reception Wiki page on Random-ness Wiki doesn't allow Qualitipedia-like pointers, then why does it have Why It Sucks and Redeeming Qualities sections, anyway?)
• 16:16, 20 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (F for that draft though)
• 14:38, 20 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (Nothing new, fewer points than other articles that carry substance, and indeed going right into the 'you can't have opinions' hyperbole automatically puts it near the bottom of the 'critique tier list'. I had a more comprehensive response draft going, but after the loss of that draft and seeing that all points boil down to roughly 3 things, I've come to refocus purely on a blog to refresh staff expectations, which comes before a larger revision of a) front page rules (based on the new cgw mo...)
• 00:55, 20 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation ({{FlowMention|Raidarr}} another... rant? you might want to adress if you get to do the response https://random.miraheze.org/wiki/Reception_Wikis IMO starts good and funny until it gets to "[they] try to eliminate a certain thing that everyone has called opinions". typical hater argument that i'm tired of debunking)
• 03:53, 19 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a reception policy for Qualitipedia ({{FlowMention|DarkMatterMan4500}} i thank you so much because after that blog i made about telling RfCs to close and that recent comment where you misread me, you finally spoke and acted in behalf of the actual points of the complaints being made, and you even apologized for the inconveniences which makes it feel even more like you're understanding the complaints. this makes me feel more relieved, even if it's a single action, and speaks good for the staff.)
• 03:24, 19 February 2022 DarkMatterMan4500 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a reception policy for Qualitipedia (I was nice enough to re-open it.)
• 03:23, 19 February 2022 DarkMatterMan4500 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a reception policy for Qualitipedia (Well then, consider this RfC re-opened. I apologize for the inconvenience.)
• 00:44, 19 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a reception policy for Qualitipedia (in simpler words since i don't think i was understood: i think the closure of thi RfC was unecessary and not very well justified.)
• 21:44, 18 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs deleted comment #1170 on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy
• 21:44, 18 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (reread my comment {{FlowMention|DarkMatterMan4500}} because never in there i stated that it was closed due to being deemed as bad and no lies about what raidarr said are being made. i'll make it clearer to you just in case: "the RfC was deemed as bad because "it's too kind to blocked users"" this refers to the opposition's arguments, NOT to the RfC closing. the timeline here refers to the time where the RfC wasn't closed yet. "the closing admin had a similar policy on his personal agenda any...)
• 21:35, 18 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs deleted comment #1169 on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy
• 21:34, 18 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (reread my comment @DarkMatterMan4500 because never in there i stated that it was closed due to being deemed as bad and no lies about what raidarr said are being made. i'll make it clearer to you just in case: "the RfC was deemed as bad because "it's too kind to blocked users"" this refers to the opposition's arguments, NOT to the RfC closing. the timeline here refers to the time where the RfC wasn't closed yet. "the closing admin had a similar policy on his personal agenda anyway." personal...)
• 21:32, 18 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (reread my comment darkmatterman because never in there i stated that it was closed due to being deemed as bad and no lies about what raidarr said are being made. i'll make it clearer to you just in case: "the RfC was deemed as bad because "it's too kind to blocked users"" this refers to the opposition's arguments, NOT to the RfC closing. the timeline here refers to the time where the RfC wasn't closed yet. "the closing admin had a similar policy on his personal agenda anyway." personal age...)
• 21:28, 18 February 2022 DarkMatterMan4500 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy ({{FlowMention|Yonydesk}} Oh you should know full well why it was closed. It wasn't because it was deemed "bad" by any means. In fact, you're missing the entire point here. We already have some of the rules in regards to the blocking policy if I'm not mistaken. Meanwhile, I see that you have made up a lie about Raidarr here (who was recently elected as a steward since yesterday) saying that this was on his "personal agenda". First of all, it wasn't his quote unquote "personal agenda" to close...)
• 21:13, 18 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (this RfC was about creating a blocking policy; in a nutshell, a guide/basis on how and when admins should block users that offend the rules, taking into account severe cases such as repeating offenders and/or long-term abussers (LTAs). the RfC was deemed as bad because "it's too kind to blocked users" by a bunch of people, who weren't capable of explaining themselves after we asked them why they thought that way. the RfC already adressed their worries yet they seemingly didn't read that part...)
• 20:54, 18 February 2022 Zangler talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a reception policy for Qualitipedia (Yonydesk is right, I believe what FatBurn intended is to enhance one of Qualitipedia's central themes for newcomers: how the reputation (reception) affects a referent being in the wiki it is.)
• 20:43, 18 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a reception policy for Qualitipedia (i have to comment on the closure of this RfC. this is really lamentable. the flow of this RfC was going normal like any other RfC, just for an admin (DarkMatterMan) to come here and outright close it due to a misunderstanding (sounds familiar? https://qualitipedia.miraheze.org/wiki/Requests_for_Comment/Creating_a_Blocking_Policy ), without any explicit community or staff consensus, even on the presence of one of the staff (now steward) having left a comment here agreeing with the direction o...)
• 20:04, 18 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a reception policy for Qualitipedia (wait WHAT literally what does this have to do with the brand DMM? proposing a policy about how we study the reception for the media pages we do has 0% to do with changing from qualitipedia back to reception wikis.)
• 18:23, 18 February 2022 DarkMatterMan4500 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a reception policy for Qualitipedia (I have just closed this RfC as invalid.)
• 18:23, 18 February 2022 King Dice talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a reception policy for Qualitipedia (Same. We don't only talk about reception, we talk and try to explain why some media is considered high quality and some no. If we wanted to be only about reception, we would various pages changed, because some are well recieved but are low quality or viceversa.)
• 18:06, 18 February 2022 DarkMatterMan4500 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a reception policy for Qualitipedia (This RfC sounds ridiculous in my eyes. I think the Qualitipedia blog name is better off.)
• 05:12, 15 February 2022 Atomicstar talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Deleting pages about deaths (Ooops I meant after)
• 10:05, 14 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (I think earlier QP has actually done responses before, but you can imagine how those went. A proper one would be interesting to see, I'll give it some thought.)
• 10:04, 14 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs deleted comment #1158 on User:Raidarr
• 10:04, 14 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs deleted comment #1157 on User:Raidarr
• 10:04, 14 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs deleted comment #1156 on User:Raidarr
• 05:43, 14 February 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on User:Raidarr (Please don't call yourself that...)
• 03:05, 14 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on User:Raidarr (wat)
• 02:53, 14 February 2022 JrStudios talk contribs posted a new comment on User:Raidarr (Making Blogs about ItsFunneh; Taking Troll jokes too far and being a dumb cunt overall)
• 13:43, 13 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (i historically can see why you don't trust leaving QP management to current staff. that said, i fully support addresing points in the rants in a public way in this wiki, as i feel an actually good, direct, and public answer from qualitipedia as an entity, to these rants is what was needed from the start instead of qualitipedia staying directly silent to the rants as if we haven't acknowledged them. it's a good public relations stunt. you can also take the opportunity to clear misinformation...)
• 13:41, 13 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs deleted comment #1154 on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation
• 13:41, 13 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (i historically can see why you don't trust leaving QP management to current staff. that said, i fully support addresing points in the rants in a public way in this wiki, as i feel an actually good, direct, and public answer from qualitipedia as an entity, to these rants is what was needed from the start instead of qualitipedia staying directly silent to the rants as if we haven't acknowledged them. it's a good public relations stunt.)
• 13:29, 13 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (The youtube rant is partially obsolete, though some of the pointers continue to hold up. The common points between each of the sources that hold up are largely the same, and again do hold up - the question is addressing them. Frankly I've found managing QP to be a bit much lately, and I'm going to need to take another approach that requires less of my ground level intervention. But so too do I frankly feel I can't just leave it to current administrators. So there's going to need to be changes...)
• 04:36, 13 February 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (Well, SephSpace did use to be a public wiki until its owner decided to make it private for whatever reason. Possibly to avoid any personal information getting leaked to outside websites and avoid any public confrontations with other wikis. That's my theory. I was actually a visitor there until I was banned from it by DuchessTheSponge over false accusations, but then another user was able to get me unbanned there and I went back to visiting it before it was shut down.)
• 03:02, 13 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (wasn't sephspace private though? like the only reason i can think they'd have an article on us on a private place is to feed their own egos)
• 03:02, 13 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs deleted comment #1150 on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation
• 03:01, 13 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (wasn't sephspace private though? like the only reason i can think they'd have an article on us on a private place is to feed their own egos)
• 02:53, 13 February 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (SephSpace's article about the Reception Wikis had a decent amount of sources that prove these wikis' flaws, too. I miss that wiki, BTW, even though some of its users did some questionable things.)
• 21:11, 12 February 2022 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (ThePackagedReviewer's rant on YouTube is probably the best of all four. The Weirdcyclopedia page has way too many unsourced claims, SMG4Nerd's DeviantArt rant has some decent points but has the "they're a bad idea" pointer, which is a load of crap, Duchess' rant is biased and unsourced, and plus both DeviantArt rants use screenshots, and sure, the YouTube rant does that too, but on the YouTube rant, it can't really help it considering that a video with pictures is usually more entertaining, w...)
• 20:42, 12 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Deleting pages about deaths (for the sake of reference, qualitipedia started in 2013 in FANDOM with crappy games wiki and transitioned to miraheze in 2018, unless you mean the rebrand from reception wikis to qualitipedia or the central wiki. but by dates, overall qualitipedia is behind depressing deaths wiki by ~6 years.)
• 20:42, 12 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs deleted comment #1146 on Requests for Comment/Deleting pages about deaths
• 20:42, 12 February 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Deleting pages about deaths (for the sake of reference, qualitipedia started in 2013 in FANDOM with crappy games wiki and transitioned to miraheze in 2018, unless you mean the rebrand from reception wikis to qualitipedia or the central wiki. but by dates, overall qualitipedia is behind depressing deaths wiki by ~6 years.)

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)