Comments log

This is a log of comments.

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

• 01:12, 7 February 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (A lot of things.)
• 00:59, 7 February 2022 Marxo Grouch talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:I am worried about Qualitipedia's reputation (What exactly do these rants complain about?)
• 23:07, 6 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the Music Wikis (Fatburn is correct, though I doubt point 1 came to mind on initial creation. It's all a bit 'water under the bridge' at this point, unless there is expressed interest in cleanup. I don't expect much given the traffic initially.)
• 22:52, 6 February 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the Music Wikis (They are basically the same wiki as well.)
• 19:37, 6 February 2022 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the Music Wikis (#You do not need to create a new wiki in order for a wiki to have a new name. You can just rename the wiki. #The original mh:thehorriblemusicandsongswikia:Horrible Music & Songs Wiki is not the same as this wiki.)
• 19:25, 6 February 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Re-adding the character wikis to Qualitipedia (Not every character has a reception, just look at Calvin's parents from ''Calvin and Hobbes''; there isn't a lot of positive or negative comments about these characters across the internet, and there was no real general consensus about them, so it was best to keep them off of both of the Characters Wikis.)
• 15:10, 6 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Re-adding the character wikis to Qualitipedia (Indeed, I was reminded of the issue and decided to act. I respect your opinion regarding the literature wikis, and I do admit their quality is highly sub par. I don't care for them. But at least the content is (seemingly) original enough.)
• 15:08, 6 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Re-adding the character wikis to Qualitipedia (That does not mean the tier lists are consistent, objective, or credible. At this point however, we're entering the realm of repetition.)
• 15:05, 6 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the Music Wikis (I don't think 'only' 10 is cause for concern, except for the administrative overhead.)
• 15:01, 6 February 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the Music Wikis (The reason why they were forks is because Delightful Music & Songs Wiki was a rename to not be confused with Best Shows & Episodes Wiki, and Worst Music & Songs Wiki was forked from Horrible Music & Songs Wiki because the proposal for adding Horrible Music & Songs Wiki to Qualitipedia went nowhere.)
• 14:57, 6 February 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Re-adding the character wikis to Qualitipedia (Characters have just as much reception as books do. There are tier lists online and videos about best vs worst characters. Idk what it is with people saying that characters don't have a lot of reception when they do have a lot of reception.)
• 14:54, 6 February 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Re-adding the character wikis to Qualitipedia (Um, there are tier lists online about what characters are preferred by fans vs which ones are hated.)
• 14:54, 6 February 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Re-adding the character wikis to Qualitipedia (And it looks like you did kick out the music wikis. I would say that the character wikis are on par in quality with the literature wikis.)
• 14:43, 6 February 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the Music Wikis (So now we only have ten Qualitipedia wikis. Twelve if my proposal passes and it doesn't look like it is going to pass.)
• 01:51, 6 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Re-adding the character wikis to Qualitipedia (Not saying much since the music wikis are dangerously close to being ejected from the network. The literature wikis are simply much newer and have more to go on from a reception perspective, though admittedly the average quality is poor. But I would again disagree that the character wikis are somehow better. Just more traffic.)
• 01:50, 6 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Re-adding the character wikis to Qualitipedia (People aren't saying that there is no reception at all, just that the standard is far harder to define, prohibitively so for a desirable wiki.)
• 01:26, 6 February 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Re-adding the character wikis to Qualitipedia (Like Marxo said, reception of characters is a lot more subjective than other types of media, and opinions on these characters can be quite divisive at times, and a lot of them don't have a lot of reception.)
• 01:23, 6 February 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Re-adding the character wikis to Qualitipedia (True, but at least the latter wikis don't have much drama or a lot of flame wars as the Characters Wikis do.)
• 01:22, 6 February 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Re-adding the character wikis to Qualitipedia (Also, the characters wikis are better quality than the music and books wikis.)
• 01:18, 6 February 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Re-adding the character wikis to Qualitipedia (What is it with people thinking that characters don't have reception. They do have reception and it is not subjective.)
• 22:06, 5 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Re-adding the character wikis to Qualitipedia (Technically speaking I'm afraid not :p Two factors count. One is strength of position, the other is consensus in the community, which is harder to explain. But the voting templates just help express the degree to which you hold a stance, but the opinion is still one person and the strength of the case is something else. Strictly speaking an RfC is not an outright vote, so while it looks and acts like one in most part, the above and other details play in to make things a little more advanced.)
• 21:33, 5 February 2022 CarlFilip19 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Re-adding the character wikis to Qualitipedia (I guess a "Strongest support" is as strong as two "Strong oppose" or something.)
• 21:20, 4 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Proposal for a new blog creation feature for all Qualitipedia wikis (Changed my mind on the counter proposal upon reviewing the feature as executed. What I had in mind is more complicated, ''possibly'' more elegant for the end user but not worth the bugfixing or bureaucratic overhead to execute. I do recommend consideration of particularly my point 2 in the vote, which could be addressed in scope of this RfC and perhaps even changed before more votes are added.)
• 17:45, 4 February 2022 Marxo Grouch talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Proposal for a new blog creation feature for all Qualitipedia wikis (It means to look for opinions on a proposal to see if it should be done or not.)
• 14:44, 4 February 2022 Gilimaster69 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Proposal for a new blog creation feature for all Qualitipedia wikis (I am confused what request for comment means.)
• 13:21, 4 February 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Proposal for a new blog creation feature for all Qualitipedia wikis (I intend to issue a more elegant counter proposal to this later, to offer a more refined system for use and an improved approach for blog categories. As much as it is your brand I do suggest against adding sections and content irrelevant to the subject/proposal for this function on QPC.)
• 21:53, 28 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (yeah, it's been one week and a day and i still await for the opposers to make an argument that actually adresses something that the RfC hasn't.)
• 21:13, 28 January 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (Yeah, I think something is off with the reading here. If I'm the closing bureaucrat I will certainly take it into account.)
• 21:12, 28 January 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (Likewise I wonder what kindness you're seeing in here that isn't more or less common sense I would enforce if I was personally involved.)
• 20:48, 28 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (ewjoqhroquiweroqewuoruqwiruoi readtherfc readtherfc readtherfc readtherfc readtherfc readtherfc readtherfc readtherfc literally don't get why y'all are saying it's too kind for the bad users and long time abusers the rfc literally says that for long time abusers the blocks are in(def)inite)
• 19:31, 28 January 2022 King Dice talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (Why try to be kind with Banned users? We can try to help he ones that apologize/were to cruel via their User Talk.)
• 23:18, 25 January 2022 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:The difference between talk pages and comment sections (That isn't really the point. The point is that users don't always consider those differences. In fact, if you look at the deletion template on one of the wikis, you will see it says to discuss the deletion in the comment section rather than the talk page.)
• 21:05, 25 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs deleted comment #1021 on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy
• 21:05, 25 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (also if you downvote fatburn again i'll come find you (i won't, but like why do you do it))
• 21:05, 25 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (also if you downvote fatburn again i'll come find you (i won't, but like why do you do it))
• 20:52, 25 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (after giving a good read to the RfC, i do have to agree that the opposers' complains are mostly already adressed on the RfC's proposal. no idea on how this will affect the validity of the oppositions' vote as they're opposing without taking in account what the RfC actually says.)
• 20:05, 25 January 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (Exactly!)
• 09:27, 25 January 2022 John 127 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Delete the NSFW and NSFL templates from all Reception Wikis (basically, we deleted the NSFL template but kept the NSFW one.)
• 09:26, 25 January 2022 John 127 talk contribs deleted comment #900 on Requests for Comment/Delete the NSFW and NSFL templates from all Reception Wikis
• 23:11, 24 January 2022 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (Okay, so the opposes here are just ridiculous. The majority of rules in this policy do not apply to vandals, sockpuppeteers and repeatedly disruptive users (this applies to long-term abusers, users who are not here to build a wiki, etc.).)
• 23:10, 24 January 2022 Money12123 talk contribs deleted comment #1016 on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy
• 23:10, 24 January 2022 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (Okay, so the opposes here are just ridiculous. The majority of rules in this policy do not apply to vandals, sockpuppeteers and repeatedly disruptive users (this applies to long-term abusers, users who are not here to build a wiki, etc.).)
• 20:57, 24 January 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (Counted among "Repeatedly disruptive users". I can't keep on adding things to this proposal.)
• 20:52, 24 January 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (I will change this a bit to alleviate some concerns.)
• 12:24, 24 January 2022 SuperSoul talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:We should make a new memes wiki. (it be a wiki without being part of the Qualitipedias.)
• 09:25, 24 January 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (It's a community vote and the subject is worth discussing. I don't agree with the execution, but I'll be the odd one out to give this proposal its due course.)
• 09:24, 24 January 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (I would think that Moisty has done more than enough to warrant the 'disruption' clause that was added rather early in the proposal.)
• 09:24, 24 January 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (Not really a point to doing this, at that point it makes just as much sense to leave it indefinite but review when necessary or appealed. If it goes past 6 months, the only case where I'd set a year time limit is say, globally for certain proxy IPs.)
• 09:23, 24 January 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (What do you mean by 'exceptions to certain rules'? Do you mean in the same way that disruption is a caveat in the proposal for quicker action?)
• 09:23, 24 January 2022 Raidarr talk contribs deleted comment #1008 on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)