Comments log

This is a log of comments.

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

• 09:22, 24 January 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (What do you mean by 'exceptions to certain rules'?)
• 00:24, 24 January 2022 DarkMatterMan4500 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (I don't really see that happening in the near future.)
• 00:23, 24 January 2022 DarkMatterMan4500 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (Yeah, I don't approve of this action whatsoever, and neither does Blazikeye535.)
• 00:21, 24 January 2022 DarkMatterMan4500 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (Yeah, no. That part especially won't be changed for any reason.)
• 00:07, 24 January 2022 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (Also, could you add users who are clearly not here to build a wiki to the users who are exceptions to certain rules?)
• 21:24, 23 January 2022 King Dice talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (Fun fact FatBurn0000: In all Wikis, off-topic blogs are allowed! '''AREN'T YOU SURPRISED?!!!''')
• 21:23, 23 January 2022 King Dice talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (Crappy Games Wiki is treated that way because it was the first wiki made, as well as the one that gains more attention for other users. I get why you are mad, but there is a reason of why various users still treat is as the Central one.)
• 21:12, 22 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (like, when did we become so afraid of mentioning even the fucking name of past controversial users?)
• 21:11, 22 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs deleted comment #1000 on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation:
• 21:11, 22 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (like, why did we become so afraid of mentioning even the fucking name of past controversial users?)
• 21:10, 22 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (i'd argue mentioning past scenarios in a referential sense is not gravedigging. tell me what part of everything i said was done with the purpose of shitting on duchess 'cause i discouraged to go after him 3 times. i just mentioned everything he's done with the least intent of insulting possible. as i said, this had to be done sooner. i still remember when explaining the impact someone had on the wikis wasn't tagged as "grave digging" or "beating a dead horse" (the ballad of the ugly rat))
• 20:41, 22 January 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (Given a total lack of central design to logos, I'm not inclined to push CGW hard on this. It's an ongoing effort, but frankly the suggestions I've seen/reached out for have proven unsatisfying.)
• 20:40, 22 January 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (The rebrand was started by Freezing, and then he lost jurisdiction (and clearly, he lacked actual consensus in the first place). Not valid. Equal attention, per my opening statements, can/should only be given at a technical and enforcement level, in other words at a bureaucrat level. There is no forcing attention from users who are not interested, or bringing in admins who will not administrate. I remain in agreement that for subjects involving cross-wiki structural action, this one is appr...)
• 18:26, 22 January 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (At the very least Crappy Games wiki should not have changed their logo and banner to be inconsistent with Awesome Games Wiki and the other wikis. If they change the logo and banner of Crappy Games Wiki back to the logo and banner that it used before, and people use this wiki as a wiki for central discussions instead of that one, then I will be happy. If one wiki gets a change then all wikis must get that change.)
• 18:22, 22 January 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (I understand the first part of your sentence, but we should use this wiki as a central wiki, not Crappy Games Wiki, regardless of whether or not it was the first wiki. Delaware was the first state, and yet you don't see people giving it a disproportionate amount of attention. We have a central wiki now.)
• 18:19, 22 January 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (So? We have a central wiki now. It may have made sense to use that as a central wiki in the past but now that this wiki is the central wiki there is no point in using Crappy Games Wiki as the central wiki anymore.)
• 16:34, 22 January 2022 Marxo Grouch talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (Okay. Thanks for sharing that, but can we all stop grave digging now?)
• 03:02, 22 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (oh and i should also add that duchess still has an eye over qualitipedia, given recent edits made by him in Encyclopedia Dramatica on early december of 2021, around raidarr's election as a bureaucrat to put him back in the users list as he's a bureaucrat now.)
• 03:02, 22 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs deleted comment #991 on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation:
• 03:02, 22 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (oh and i should also add that duchess still has an eye over qualitipedia, given recent edits made by him in Encyclopedia Dramatica on early december of 2021, around raidarr's election as a bureaucrat to put him back in the users list as he's a bureaucrat now.)
• 02:53, 22 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (i know that i might get accused of "beating a dead horse" since this thread is old, but i don't mind it. these things had to be said sooner.)
• 02:44, 22 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (despite all, it was clear that duchess wasn't simply... the most apt person at being a leader, as much as its intentions were good. he often refused to take accountability from the mistakes he did. idk how he was elected. that said, the duchess from months ago that wanted to improve qualitipedia, isn't the same as the one today. come to my ted talk thx (NOTE: i'm explaining situations here, don't go and harass anyone mentioned here, they don't deserve it (probably) and won't make you a hero....)
• 00:03, 22 January 2022 King Dice talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (I also see it that way. Good intentions, bad excecutions.)
• 23:51, 21 January 2022 King Dice talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:The difference between talk pages and comment sections (Do you think we are that stupid to not get those differences?)
• 23:44, 21 January 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (Sorry for the late response and I might be gravedigging at this point, but I didn't really think Duchess was inherently a bad user. Sure, he made some questionable choices like deleting the YouTube page from RWW, banning me from Sephspace, and falsely accusing Grust, but I still thought he had good intentions, even though they sometimes screw up in the end.)
• 23:43, 21 January 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs deleted comment #985 on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation:
• 23:43, 21 January 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Regarding the DuchessTheSponge situation: (Sorry for the late response and I might be gravedigging at this point, but I didn't really Duchess was inherently a bad user. Sure, he made some questionable choices like deleting the YouTube page from RWW, banning me from Sephspace, and falsely accusing Grust, but I still thought he had good intentions, even though they sometimes screw up in the end.)
• 22:34, 21 January 2022 TigerBlazer talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (You really can't change how much attention the community gives each wiki. People are going to be interested in the games, film, and TV show wikis more than the others since they have a larger editor base and page count, as well as larger interest in the topics as a whole. The community will naturally come to CGW more since it was the first and has the most activity, while the book wikis on the other hand naturally get little attention for being not as popular of a subject and a low editorbase...)
• 22:28, 21 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (the rebrand that's going now is different than the one that was being established by FreezingTNT's your last statement is a personal concern and that's not on the interest of the reception wikis' current agenda unless you can back it with, you know, not already debunked arguments.)
• 20:14, 21 January 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (The rebrand was put in place my FreezingTNT. When he was overthrown, much of the progress of the rebrand was undone. The wikis do need to be given at least somewhat equal attention though.)
• 20:13, 21 January 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (No.)
• 15:30, 21 January 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (I agree with the first sentence and that CGW receives arbitrary changes or improvements that fail to make it across QP. I disagree with the rest. * The 'rebrand' is not sanctioned by either the bureaucrats or the community at large, thus is invalid. Start a new discussion so we can agree with which parts to continue with. * Proportionate attention is not relevant to any user except the bureaucrats and users interested at a network scale. Nobody else is or can be obligated to care, and to forc...)
• 15:23, 21 January 2022 Raidarr talk contribs deleted comment #979 on Blog:Please stop with this
• 15:23, 21 January 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (I agree with the first sentence and I agree that CGW gets arbitrary changes or improvements inconsistent with the rest of QP. I disagree with everything else. * Tge 'rebrand' is a)
• 15:14, 21 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (jokes aside, i don't see how this damages qualitipedia. this is not our problem; whatever is the wiki people put most of their cents on is the one they're most interested. it's a demographic interest thing, there will always be one wiki that shines over the rest and we can't do much about that, and i think we already did good on promoting the other qp wikis. in fact i think this blog is actually harmful as you're practically telling the demographic what they should do.)
• 15:09, 21 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (and his troll-like behaviour doesn't help; the way he inserts "look i'm funny"-like stuff in everything he says always makes you ask yourself if he's being genuine or just wants to piss you off people like these always give hard times in communities)
• 15:06, 21 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (moisty made things way too quick to make his alleged remorse seem genuine. first time he "came back" this month wasn't to show any pity, and his recent "apology" was practically right after the new offenses that he did, so nobody bought that. it's completely reasonable to not have trusted him and i think we shouldn't have trusted anyway. by common sense you can't expect someone to instantly change its ways in the next minute. it should be given a reasonable cooldown time (i.e. a block) based...)
• 00:00, 21 January 2022 Yonydesk talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (are you the emperor of the reception wikis?)
• 23:38, 20 January 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (But Crappy Games Wiki was the first-ever Reception Wiki, and came before others like Awful Movies Wiki or Terrible TV Shows Wiki during the FANDOM days, so of course it'll be treated as the main wiki on Qualitipedia.)
• 23:14, 20 January 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (They all should have changed the banner. And you mean banner, not logo. All of the wikis must be consistent. Also, if one wiki allows off-topic blogs then they all should.)
• 23:12, 20 January 2022 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Please stop with this (To be fair CGW allows off-topic blogs, and also I don't think it's a big deal if it's just one category of wikis, but something I do want to mention is that AGW should have changed its logo to be similar to CGW's logo.)
• 23:07, 20 January 2022 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (Another thing is that admins should consider long yet temporary blocks. Blocks for 1, 2, 3 or more years might actually be better than an indefinite block in some cases.)
• 22:38, 20 January 2022 TigerBlazer talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (Really to an extent users such as Moisty or Hazmat did enough that remorse isn't really an option in some cases and should have been blocked indefinitely in a similar way to sockpuppet accounts for really serious forms of disruption, considering both both felt remorse and immediately went back to their old ways.)
• 20:15, 20 January 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (I added that in.)
• 20:12, 20 January 2022 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (That too. But if they feel remorse for their actions it should be considered. And offenders as in deliberate rule breakers.)
• 19:53, 20 January 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (Or how about other users who keep being assholes like Hamzat213 or MoistyTIT?)
• 19:52, 20 January 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs deleted comment #966 on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy
• 19:52, 20 January 2022 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (Or maybe other users who keep being assholes like Hamzat213 or MoistyTIT)
• 19:47, 20 January 2022 Marxo Grouch talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Creating a Blocking Policy (I get your points about sockpuppets and vandals, but what about repeat offenders who refuse to see the error of their ways (ie someone like LeroyManTheFirst)?)
• 21:15, 17 January 2022 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:The difference between talk pages and comment sections (The deletion template on all wikis actually needs to be updated for consistency anyway. As far as the gist here, I do agree.)

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)