Comments log

This is a log of comments.

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

• 19:49, 17 September 2021 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Make new wikis for good and bad countries (My thoughts exactly. Games, movies, shows, books, websites, characters, and music are enough for Qualitipedia.)
• 19:43, 17 September 2021 TigerBlazer talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Idea for store reception wikis (Store reception wikis are a terrible idea, and we don't need one for everything as they get repetitive and that one would be very pointless, as stores don't really have receptions.)
• 18:58, 17 September 2021 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Renaming Crappy Games Wiki (He did it in his Top 10 Weirdest SpongeBob Games videos (I think that was the one). He just showed a brief snippet of a page, and did not credit the wiki at all, most likely due to its name. In this case, this will mean that kid-friendly channels will be unable to cite Crappy Games Wiki as a source.)
• 16:55, 17 September 2021 Equal One talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Make new wikis for good and bad countries (I don't Qualitpedia needs to expand to more wikis like this now just to cover '''everything'''. The current wikis we have are far enough.)
• 16:16, 17 September 2021 DarkMatterMan4500 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Make new wikis for good and bad countries (I think this request should be closed immediately.)
• 14:36, 17 September 2021 Marxo Grouch talk contribs deleted comment #477 on Requests for Comment/Banning pages on real people
• 14:36, 17 September 2021 Marxo Grouch talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Banning pages on real people (Are you seriously still on this? Look, we are '''''not''''' closing those wikis down just because ''you'' want them closed down.)
• 14:18, 17 September 2021 Thenstale talk contribs deleted comment #476 on Requests for Comment/Banning pages on real people Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 14:14, 17 September 2021 Thenstale talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Banning pages on real people (And also characters wikis must get banned forever.) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 14:14, 17 September 2021 Thenstale talk contribs deleted comment #475 on Requests for Comment/Banning pages on real people Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 14:14, 17 September 2021 Thenstale talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Banning pages on real people (And also characters wikis must get banned forever.) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 10:38, 17 September 2021 Suppai talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Delete the NSFW and NSFL templates from all Reception Wikis (These NSFW and NSFL serve little good purpose. I've seen these NSFW and NSFL tags used on pages for media that is intended for the family and children!)
• 08:38, 17 September 2021 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Should we cut the toy wikis loose? (You can post that on the RfC, but I'm afraid it's wrapping up in favor of closing.)
• 06:33, 17 September 2021 Maxkatzur talk contribs deleted comment #366 on Requests for Comment/Ban custom headings on Qualitipedia
• 02:58, 17 September 2021 Marxo Grouch talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Ban custom headings on Qualitipedia (Even if the RfC passed with more opposition than support, I won't be adding custom headings on any pages I make (of which I have two pages published and two more in development), let alone adding them to any pre-existing page (though I may fix them up if needed).)
• 02:48, 17 September 2021 Master Chief talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Should we cut the toy wikis loose? (Keep them, anyone can enjoy playing with toys, and toys can be good or bad quality.)
• 02:27, 17 September 2021 RockyBalboaFan talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Ban custom headings on Qualitipedia (Keep them.)
• 00:25, 17 September 2021 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Background color changes (I will admit this could make a case of sorts for adjusting the Website wikis given I think they have the perfect formula for what you indicate here. But again, I'm rather opposed to throwing yellow onto another wiki, especially the website ones.)
• 00:12, 17 September 2021 DarkMatterMan4500 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Renaming Crappy Games Wiki (This request is '''NOW''' closed and marked as invalid.)
• 00:05, 17 September 2021 DarkMatterMan4500 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Renaming Crappy Games Wiki (I'm closing this as invalid.)
• 00:03, 17 September 2021 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs deleted comment #466 on Requests for Comment/Ban custom headings on Qualitipedia
• 00:02, 17 September 2021 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Ban custom headings on Qualitipedia (Well, looks like we have a winner.)
• 23:43, 16 September 2021 Marxo Grouch talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Background color changes (I feel like a color scheme resembling Miraheze Meta (a more muted palette) would be more fitting for our Meta, but that's just me.)
• 22:01, 16 September 2021 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Ban custom headings on Qualitipedia (Inka; following discussion with DMM, oppose is successful and the custom headers will ''not'' be banned. If someone is still enforcing it, please point them to this and/or let DarkMatterMan know.)
• 21:34, 16 September 2021 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Renaming Crappy Games Wiki (* We're not going to become a multinational conglomerate, nor should we. To become such would require a level of professionalism that would invalidate most users on these wikis from coming along, quite frankly. Even you. * There are no 'popularity issues' that are relevant at this time. * Pulitzer Prize is very much getting ahead of ourselves. You should moderate your own approach and indeed, your personal brand recognition before you press forth on trying to determine it for these wikis. W...)
• 21:26, 16 September 2021 Inka Dinka Doo talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Ban custom headings on Qualitipedia (I'm a bit confused. Custom Headers were banned, yet Oppose won.... I'm personally Abstain with it, since some Headers were rather confusing and some even broke the Rules and Guidelines, but some of them were a bit creative and kept a few articles a tiny bit more creative. I'm fine if they go, but I'm just confused, since Oppose got more votes than support.)
• 20:32, 16 September 2021 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Which Qualitipedia wiki category is your favorite? (None, TBH.)
• 20:26, 16 September 2021 Kingjorbs talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Renaming Crappy Games Wiki (Proof that PhantomStrider showed a brief snippet of the CGW, can you send me a link to show that actually happened?)
• 20:15, 16 September 2021 King Dice talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Which Qualitipedia wiki category is your favorite? (I like the game ones)
• 19:42, 16 September 2021 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Which Qualitipedia wiki category is your favorite? (I guess so, but Greatest Movies Wiki, Best Shows & Episodes Wiki, and Awesome Games Wiki are relatively popular. It seems like the wikis that were a part of Qualitipedia's predecessor, the Triangle Of Opinionated Entertainment (which consisted of the movies wikis, tv shows wikis, games wikis, and Rotten Websites Wiki), are more popular. That could have to do with how long the wikis have been around, because Crappy Games Wiki, which was the first Reception Wiki (from FANDOM back in 2013), is t...)
• 19:34, 16 September 2021 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Which Qualitipedia wiki category is your favorite? (A lot of it has to do with appeal. People like bitching. Thus negative wikis tend to get more attention by default. People like to go on about visual media and games more than anything else, while websites and the others are harder to pin down for reception and just aren't as interesting to go on about. I'm not sure they strictly need too much more traffic, but they certainly are and will remain the weaker points. I do think websites can at least be made more useful, and I do agree that main...)
• 19:30, 16 September 2021 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Which Qualitipedia wiki category is your favorite? (Yeah. We do need a lot more traffic towards the literature wikis and music wikis. Also Worst Music & Songs Wiki needs to have its main page updated to match the other wikis. As for the websites wikis, Rotten Websites Wiki seems to be good but Fresh Websites Wiki needs more traffic. It could be just due to the sheer popularity of movies, shows, episodes, and games, considering that it is really easy to find reviews of those three categories. There isn't as much reception concerning websites, m...)
• 19:28, 16 September 2021 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Should we cut the toy wikis loose? (What would this look like as a wiki?)
• 19:27, 16 September 2021 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Should we cut the toy wikis loose? (Yeah, these were very ill advised wikis to add.)
• 19:27, 16 September 2021 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:This Needs To Be Done (I agree, these wikis should not be political. Political alignment of a work has nothing to do with its overall quality. And why does GamerGate matter? That was a random thing from like 5 years ago, and whether or not people supported it or were opposed to it has absolutely nothing to do with the overall goal of the wikis.)
• 19:26, 16 September 2021 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Which Qualitipedia wiki category is your favorite? (I could dig up some traffic stats for each wiki as well if it would be interesting. I believe shows, movies and games would all be high up, with websites trailing closer, and the last two struggling in comparison.)
• 19:21, 16 September 2021 Blubabluba9990 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Should we cut the toy wikis loose? (Toys aren't really media, nor is there really "reception" for toys. Also, Duchess just randomly decided to add them to the network without consensus.)
• 16:17, 16 September 2021 Busybody43 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Ban custom headings on Qualitipedia (I think we should keep custom headers. Every wiki needs some sort of humor, whether it be joke userpages, or humorous image names, or just amusing sentences in articles. (Like the son's drawing page on the papers please wiki))
• 12:09, 16 September 2021 TigerBlazer talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Renaming Crappy Games Wiki (Yeah, we do not need more recognition, now please drop the subject.)
• 11:36, 16 September 2021 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Ban custom headings on Qualitipedia (Oppose does have a good lead, though. It's noted.)
• 11:36, 16 September 2021 Raidarr talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Ban custom headings on Qualitipedia (I think the more credible argument that people ''mean'' to use is that it looks more immature, not that it strictly has something to do with being professional - though that is something we're trying to do at a broader level, mainly for administration so errors in staff can be reduced.)
• 07:52, 16 September 2021 CrashFan talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Delete the NSFW and NSFL templates from all Reception Wikis (Not Safe For Life.)
• 07:21, 16 September 2021 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Ban custom headings on Qualitipedia (It isn't protected, what are you talking about?)
• 07:19, 16 September 2021 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Ban custom headings on Qualitipedia (@NJPet and @Boomerang289 Could you two please explain why you think so? Not to be rude but I don't think it's fair to just say "Yes" or "No".)
• 07:09, 16 September 2021 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:We need neutral wikis (I think it already is pretty much like that, ones with mixed-to-positive reviews go on the good wikis.)
• 07:08, 16 September 2021 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:We need neutral wikis (If we can't, then I don't want anything like this done. No merging them all into one or even two, no creating neutral wikis, etc. If we can import comments, I may be okay with one or two of those things, but if we can't import comments, none of this should happen. These wikis already probably lost loads of comments when it migrated, all the comments on the Fandom version were probably deleted.)
• 07:06, 16 September 2021 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:We need neutral wikis (That's a terrible idea Imo, I'd rather we keep it as it is but if something has to change, we should perhaps merge the negative ones into one wiki and the positive ones into one wiki. Like it could be Crappy Media Wiki and Awesome Media Wiki. However, I'm only okay with that idea if we can import the comments as well.)
• 07:02, 16 September 2021 Money12123 talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Delete the NSFW and NSFL templates from all Reception Wikis (What does NSFL stand for?)
• 04:16, 16 September 2021 Thenstale talk contribs posted a new comment on Blog:Is there everyone gonna help to delete characters and websites wikis? (Fine.) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 03:42, 16 September 2021 SuperStreetKombat talk contribs posted a new comment on Requests for Comment/Renaming Crappy Games Wiki (I don't think anyone cares if Qualitipedia is popular or not, and I doubt any of us here wanna win some prize or whatever either, because we're a niche community and we only do what we do on our wikis because we choose to and we're passionate about it, not because we're in it for fame or glory, which we aren't. Even if we do become more popular, our target audience will always remain the same, and that is 13 years old or over, not under. Besides, most of the outside sources are already very...)

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)