Requests for Comment/Wiki logos

{{ClosedRfC|Closing this request as a little bit mixed. All I have to say is that there's some consensus of changing the logos, but I do think we can keep them as is, unless the logo changes are absolutely necessary. --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) 13:57, 20 October 2021 (UTC)|I created this request mainly because I don't like the current logos used for wikis on Qualitipedia. They look really faint to the point that some of them have a poorly readable wordmark. Hence, Qualitipedia needs a rebrand on every wiki, when it comes to logos appearing in the upper left corner. Also, Meta needs a logo as this is the default one from Miraheze, unless you are aware of it and the logo is under the work. Allistayrian (talk) 17:39, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) We need something more professional and appealing. Marxo Grouch  (talk) 18:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) I agree with you, Marxo, the logos look like the ones made by the ###cast Network, with the toys wikis being the worst offender. Also, I think we should redesign the logos so they could resemble TNT's ones but not rip-off MatPat's ones. NJPet (talk) 06:42, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Could you provide a 'generic', editable template of the old logo and we can see how to redesign it from there (though perhaps in detail elsewhere like a discussion/blog)? --Raidarr (talk) 09:10, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I thought about making a logo that resembles TNT's logos, but has a different shape with thinner or thicker "sides" for the colors of the wikis. NJPet (talk) 12:56, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * By all means. I forgot to note though: it should be flexible, and we should not be penned into a certain number like we were last time. --Raidarr (talk) 14:08, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) They need to look cleaner. King Dice (talk)
 * 2) For CGW, it is a SNES controller. The SNES was a pretty good console, so it doesn't makes sense to be the CGW logo. The AGW logo seems too bland and not really unique/original as well. And then RWW looks like either a generic clipart of something supposedly depicting the internet, or a logo for some 1990s web browser software or dial up service (also the mouse is old enough to not have a scroll wheel). --Atomicstar (talk) 03:13, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 3) Yes, we need something better Galaxy Star (talk) 17:31, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Oppose
At this point I think we're better off bundling this process with a better look at Qualitipedia's visual design. We talk talk talk about logo improvements, only change them for a couple of the most active wikis, and in that case we've changed CGW's logo at least three times already. At this point just leave it alone and try to make the wikis overall look better. Maybe if we use a skin that isn't highly out of date and a color scheme that's rather infamous even within Miraheze, we can consider looking at logos that then fit a better design. They kind of fit in as it is given the effort on everything else visually.

"Need to look nice" is matched by the wikis otherwise looking rather bad in every other way and the function of the wikis still being very flawed. The roof is caving in and we're worrying about squeaky door hinges. --Raidarr (talk) 10:50, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Abstain
}}