Requests for Comment/Creating policy regarding deletions and restorations

Here is my third revision of my past two proposals. I said in the past two proposals why I am making this one, so there is no need to restate my points. Here is what I propose:

Clause 1: Quick Deletions
A page may be deleted without discussion if:
 * It is nonsense, gibberish, vandalism, or spam (this includes pages that are created blank).
 * It does not follow the Reception Policy (though in more controversial cases a discussion will be held, which is discussed further below)
 * The page is unfinished. In that case, the user will be notified of the page's deletion on their talk page and will be asked to finish the page in their sandbox. A page is considered "finished" if:
 * It contains a complete infobox
 * It has at least three reasons why the piece of media is positive or negative. They do not need to be long or detailed.
 * It has a section for reception. A section listing good/bad qualities is optional, though recommended on more controversial pages.
 * The page is an unnecessary redirect, which includes redirects left over from uncontroversial page moves.

Clause 2: Deletion and Restoration Discussions
For pages that are ambiguous with their relation to the Reception Policy, there will be a discussion held on the talk page. The discussion will work similarly to how RfCs work, but will take place on the page's talk page. They will work similarly to RfCs. A tag will then be placed on the page that says there is currently a discussion for the page's deletion in place. Restoration discussions work the same way, except there is no template. A list of all deletion and restoration discussions will be listed on a separate page (two separate pages listing deletion discussions and restoration discussions, with a link to the page and to the thread in which the deletion or restoration discussion is taking place). For restoration discussions, a link to the page being considered for restoration is not necessary for obvious reasons. Closed deletion and restoration discussions will also be listed on their own separate pages as proof of their existence. A link to the discussion will also be required in the deletion/restoration summary.

Like I have said, there isn't really any need to restate why I am making this proposal, as this is technically a revision of two of my past proposals. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:40, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) As proposer. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:40, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) I have noticed some admins open discussions for deletion instead of immediately deleting which is great, but I think this should become an official policy. This can help avoid controversial deletions, and give time if someone wants to jump in to improve the page. We don't really need a list page to list deletion discussions as the candidates for deletion category is enough. As for restoration requests, I'm abstaining because I'm not sure if it is necessary, admins usually look at recent changes and see talk page additions. Until Qualitipedia becomes big enough, I don't see it becoming a problem in the near future. ᗩTOᗰIᑕᔕTᗩᖇ 💬 ⌨ 01:19, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 3) per above. I gotta agree with the denying of restoration requests. Zangler (talk) 11:40, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 4) That should've been a standard anyway. --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) 12:36, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 5) This has my fullest support. The fact that this has not been a policy already honestly shocks me, especially with how strict the staff is on QP. Bukkit (talk) 00:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 6) I'm surprised this isn't a policy already. However, the definition on unfinished pages feels a little lax. Maybe five reasons would work better? Tali64³ (talk) 22:29, 18 June 2022 (UTC)