Requests for Comment/Becoming independent

{{ClosedRfC|This is not closed strictly because of opposition (although, there's that too), rather the inability for this RfC to achieve its goal. So much more is necessary for this to become reality that the OP does not give it credit for, not least of which a 'trustee' for the domain and server host (as well as the money for both), the technical competence and willingness from various parties, the willingness of the administration itself to have this larger discussion, and the reasonable assumption that the community at large does not see the need for this. Therefore the RfC is closed, though individual pieces may be explored by the administration as time goes on. --Raidarr (talk) 21:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC)|I propose that Qualitipedia moves to an independent platform. Even though I love Miraheze, I feel as though it is practical to move the Qualitipedia wikis to an independent platform, since the wikis already function as an independent network with a centralized administration and rules that apply on all of the wikis. In addition, it may be able to boost our popularity. Here are the proposed new URLs (the Cancelled wikis and Toys wikis are not included due to RFCs to remove them):
 * meta.qualitipedia.org (Meta wiki)
 * login.qualitipedia.org (login wiki)
 * awfulmovies.qualitipedia.org
 * greatestmovies.qualitipedia.org
 * terribleshowsandepisodes.qualitipedia.org
 * bestshowsandepisodes.qualitipedia.org
 * awesomegames.qualitipedia.org
 * crappygames.qualitipedia.org
 * rottenwebsites.qualitipedia.org
 * freshwebsites.qualitipedia.org
 * magnificentliterature.qualitipedia.org
 * dreadfulliterature.qualitipedia.org
 * delightfulmusicandsongs.qualitipedia.org
 * worstmusicandsongs.qualitipedia.org

Support

 * 1)  As proposer. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:16, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Oppose
}}
 * 1) Not a snowball's chance, sorry. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) 00:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) While it would be good to have our own network, setting it up would take way to much time and we might lose a lot of out userbase in the process of moving. Bad idea, with a little promise. TigerBlazer (talk) 01:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 3) Given the time it would take to do such a thing, I don't really see this being a possibility. Marxo Grouch  (talk) 02:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 4) On second thought, we should not become independent, as it can easily consume a ton of the userbase in the process of moving. This is a very bad idea. Fortdicted (talk) 02:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 5) I for one do see it as a possibility, but not now. There are several community-level requirements I find are unsatisfied. --Raidarr (talk) 08:40, 17 September 2021 (UTC)