Requests for Comment/Creating a mature content template

Support

 * 1) As proposer. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:47, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) NSFW stands for not safe for work. Will you get in trouble if someone sees you reading something on QP that has the NSFW template while at work? Most likely not. It is normal for someone to read a news article about a sensitive topic such as crime or violence, which in that nature we likely would put an NSFW template in. So I'd say we should change the template to say mature instead of NSFW. Another thing, this is a small thing, ut on CGW, where we use mature instead of NSFW, it says mature 17+ (ESRB), but it also says not suitable for under 18. This may be a nitpicky thing to say, but still something I wanted to mention that maybe we should be more consistent.  15:06, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1)  The [blank]-rated templates perform the same function.    19:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I do not know what you mean by "[blank]-rated" templates. If you are referring to the NSFW template, NSFW refers to a specific kind of mature content, so I am suggesting changing it to be a mature content template. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I meant templates like these.   20:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Well that is only on Crappy Games Wiki. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 21:29, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The template exists on every wiki, only in a different form.   23:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * No, as the mature content template it only exists on the games wikis and on Greatest Movies Wiki. The other wikis use the NSFW template. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:18, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * They still perform the same task.   12:19, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1) We already have them. NSFW is the same as Mature, we just need to edit it and that's it.  20:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * No, NSFW is a type of mature content. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 21:28, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The point you are missing is that the NSFW template has been remade into a mature template, so we don't need to create another one. FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 23:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * But that is only on Crappy Games Wiki. We need to change it for the other 9 Qualitipedia wikis (not counting this one). Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:11, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I do agree with that, but what I mean is, we do not need to make a RFC about this, or at least, not one about creating a mature content template, if anything, you should state what ideas you have for mature templates on other wikis. As I have said before though, I have already done that. Also, about NSFW vs. NSFL, while I do agree Mature is better, technically, NSFW stands for Not Safe for Work, and NSFL can therefore technically qualify as NSFW. FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 01:31, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) We already have one for the games wikis. However, we do need ones for other wikis, and I would recommend people take a look at this if they haven't already. FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 23:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) Seems redundant. We already have a Mature on the Games wikis and Restricted on Movies wikis. Although we do need a Mature template for the TV Shows wikis. User:HawkeyeSolo 19:11, 17 May 2022 (EST)
 * We also need a Mature on the Websites wikis and the Books wikis. Why do people keep forgetting that those wikis exist? It really gets on my nerves. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:11, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, the Restricted template is only on Greatest Movies Wiki, not Awful Movies Wiki. We still need 7 other Mature templates to be made. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * What are you talking about? We do have Mature on both wikis. 16:13, 20 May 2022 (UTC)