Blog:Some rules and suggestions for Qualitipedia

Here are some rules I think should be added to Qualitipedia and some suggestions and ideas I have for the network. Note that I will most likely update this.

Main rules

 * 1) If someone is working on an article in their sandbox, is working on an article on a sandbox page, or is even working on an opinionated blog post that is half-professional (not 100% professional because it's opinionated) about a certain topic, DO NOT create an article or sandbox page about the same topic. We will lose history and comments if you do this. Before creating a page, make sure to double check all namespaces to see if anyone has created anything about the same topic.
 * 2) Negative articles on celebrities with more than one career should be banned from this wiki. This is because if they have more than one career, we can't just randomly decide which wiki they go on. For example, they might be a professional game creator, but they also make toys. Will they go on mh:crappygames:Crappy Games Wiki or mh:upsettingtoys:Upsetting Toys Wiki? It isn't fair to randomly decide. These celebrities could've gone to mh:trashycelebrities:Trashy Celebrities Wiki, but since that wiki violates the content policy, these articles will have to be deleted for good. Also note that two
 * 3) *As for positive articles, they will have to go too, but they won't have to be deleted for good. I am planning on making a wiki called mh:fabulouscelebrities:Fabulous Celebrities Wiki, so we can import them there. Also, can we import comments?
 * 4) *Also, in terms for companies who make two types of media (ex. a studio that makes shows and movies), they should go to mh:horriblecompanies:Horrible Companies Wiki . And yet again, a sister wiki can be created for the positive ones.
 * 5) We should use Pre and Post titles for pages about celebrities/companies/etc. that improved (ex. the Nickelodeon page on Best Shows & Episodes Wiki would be called mh:besttvshows:Nickelodeon (Pre-2009) and the Terrible Shows & Episodes Wiki page would be called mh:terribletvshows:Nickelodeon (Post-2008)) as I think it looks better this way. Note that the same shouldn't apply for seasons (ex. the The Simpsons page on Best Shows & Episodes Wiki should stay as mh:besttvshows:The Simpsons (Seasons 1-15, 31-present) and the page on Terrible Shows & Episodes Wiki should stay as mh:terribletvshows:The Simpsons (Seasons 16-30)) because I think that looks good as it is.
 * 6) Media from the internet (with the exception of games since they're way more professional than other media from the internet) should not be on the Qualitipedia wikis. When I say this, I don't mean movies and TV shows from mh:freshwebsites:Netflix, I mean like movies, TV shows, songs, etc. from mh:rottenwebsites:YouTube. The reason is because they will clog up the wiki. I think we should make another network like Qualitipedia for internet media.
 * 7) Do not work on an article you plan to move to the mainspace in your sandbox. This is not what it is for. Sandboxes are for test editing (and if you're like me, you may also list your sandbox pages there). If you want to work on an article that you plan to move to the mainspace, title it User:[insert your username here]/sandbox/[insert planned page title here].
 * 8) No stylisations whatsoever. In case you don't know what a stylisation is, it's things like when people write the title of a type of media in capitals/lowercase, add a hashtag, use a dollar sign ($) instead of an S and other stuff like that.
 * 9) *Note that exclamation points and question marks do not count as stylisations.

Admin rules and suggestions

 * 1) In addition to MR#1, admins should not delete articles just because the article in question is bad. They should instead move it to a sandbox page (in case you don't know what I mean by a sandbox page, its title is like this: User:[insert creator's username here]/sandbox/[insert former title of page here]). They should not move it to the user's sandbox for reasons listed at MR#5. If this is not a rule, we will lose history and comments.
 * 2) *Also, if the article is deleted because it is opinionated/the reception says otherwise (which is technically the same thing, I'm just stating this to be clear) it should be moved to a blog post and the owner of the blog post should be the creator of the page. Yet again, we will lose history and comments and while you could argue it isn't important, various users may be interested in seeing the history and comments the page had.
 * 3) We don't need to delete everything to do with users. We just need to look out for drama-starting pages, biased pages and wikis that violate the content policy. If you guys don't want users on mh:rottenwebsites:Rotten Websites Wiki, then fine, but there is still no need for this.
 * 4) Don't block users indefinitely their first time unless it's actually necessary. This comes off as extremely unfair.