Requests for Comment/Make a Qualitipedia reception wiki about electronics

{{ClosedRfC|a) lack of interest, b) already exists. Feel free to contribute to the existing wikis, or even suggest adding them to their lineup if you believe they would fit. --Raidarr (talk) 13:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC) | Hello! I recently have a idea about a new Qualitipedia reception wiki, Here's the ideas:

Successful Electronics Wiki for good electronics like TVs and Cameras.

Failed Electronics Wiki for flopped electronics like HD-DVD.

What do you think of this idea? Do you support it or oppose it?

Support

 * 1) As a creator of this request.

Oppose
}}
 * 1) While I think this is a good idea, there is already mh:abysmalhardware:Abysmal Hardware Wiki and mh:excellenthardware:Excellent Hardware Wiki, which I think would cover the same thing. FatBurn0000 (talk) 07:26, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) We have enough wikis in our network already. Wing Commander confed star.pngTigerBlazer  10:23, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 3) No particular need, overlapping purpose with existing wikis per above, and unhelpful where I believe the priority should be cleaning up existing operation, not adding more to worry about when other Qualitipedia wikis are, frankly, neglected. --Raidarr (talk) 12:42, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 4) Not everything need a reception wiki, and less being considered part of the Qualitipedia. Do you know that? King Dice (talk) 13:04, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 5) Unnecessary given the existence of the two wikis mentioned by FatBurn. Also, we have enough wikis in our network already. Not everything needs a reception wiki nowadays. Marxo Grouch  (talk) 18:56, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 6) I will only describe it as: "What too much is not healthy." The wikis about the hardware already exist. —A llistayrian  (💬) 19:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 7) Already have the hardware wikis.  Mr. Jay 641  (📄) 22:07, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 8) Like Mr. Jay 641 said, the hardware wikis already serve that purpose. Also, they will not be added to Qualitipedia, because Qualitipedia is only the twelve media wikis. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 23:46, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Going to step in here to say Qualitipedia is not held to a particular required number or layout. --Raidarr (talk) 00:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Qualitipedia is only the wikis listed in the rebrand. Qualitipedia officially consists of the movies wikis, shows and episodes wikis, games wikis, websites wikis, literature wikis, and music wikis. Those were the wikis included in the original lineup. No other wikis should be added or removed. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 22:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Just because those are the wikis in the original lineup doesn't mean more should be added or removed. FatBurn0000 (talk) 22:19, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) About a year ago I created Crappy Tech Wiki (now closed). I gave up because there aren't enough points to describe why a product was terrible. It will be hard to get enough points to write quality articles like most Qualitipedia Wikis do. --Atomicstar (talk) 03:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * What about electronics themselves though? Like apple phones, computers, iPads, iPods, etc. I don't see how there couldn't be enough pointers. FatBurn0000 (talk) 07:55, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Problem is, I don't think there are many unique pointers. You can write a page about iPhone and a page for Samsung Galaxy, but because they are close competitors they have a lot of similar features, they will be quite repeated. If you include just the unique features, there's not really enough pointers to write a quality article unless you plan to explain everything in depth. As for flopped electronics, most electronics flopped due to lack of certain features, lack of useful purpose, or too overpriced, again there likely won't be enough pointers to meet Qualitipedia's standards. Maybe with the exception of some things where the whole concept is terrible, such as Juicero, or scams such as SoftRAM etc.. --Atomicstar (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree with Atomicstar, they will get repetitive after a while, and will be an incredibly bland wiki. Wing Commander confed star.pngTigerBlazer 17:29, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Still, the bad qualities and good qualities should be explained. Or at least in my opinion. FatBurn0000 (talk) 07:26, 23 October 2021 (UTC)