Blog:Marxo's thoughts on related media (movies, spin-offs, licensed games, etc.) as good/bad qualities

This is an itch that I gotta scratch. I'm posting this here since it applies to all of Qualitipedia. I'm getting this off my chest while being uncertain if there will be a majority agreeing with my stance on this (or if me making this blog post is pointless or not). Throughout Qualitipedia (and especially on the big three subjects, which are games, movies, and shows) I have noticed pointers that mention different media related to a page's main subject matter. More specifically, these pointers assert that something is good/bad just because it spawned extra things like a theatrical movie, a spin-off series, or licensed games. Whenever I see these pointers, I end up feeling rather irked since to me it feels a bit off topic. I am more interested in reading about the main SpongeBob show's great qualities, and I pretty certain that the movie is not something that is meant to enhance the main show. I would understand such a pointer if we were talking about a franchise, but the SpongeBob page on BS&EW is talking about the main show, not the franchise itself. Consequently, these kinds of pointers come off to me as completely unnecessary since a singular piece of media should be able to stand on its own rather than have to be supported by extraneous media. That is my piece. I eagerly await feedback in the comments section. Note that this does not apply to episodes of a show. Ciao!