Blog:Uncreated/unknown wikis 2.0

Since my blog post on CGW, Uncreated/unknown wikis is pretty much dead, I'm making a second version of it. Anyway, this blog is for reception wikis and ideas for reception wikis that I'd like your opinions on.

Already-existing wikis

 * 1) mh:lousyvehicles:Lousy Vehicles Wiki and mh:loveablevehicles:Lovable Vehicles Wiki
 * 2) mh:godawfulschools:Godawful Schools Wiki
 * 3) Horrible Companies Wiki and Marvelous Companies Wiki
 * 4) mh:horridgamemods:Horrid Video Game Mods Wiki and mh:flawlessgamemods:Flawless Video Game Mods Wiki
 * 5) mh:horriblefridaynightfunkinmods:Horrible Friday Night Funkin' Mods Wiki and Wondorous Friday Night Funkin' Mods Wiki
 * 6) Worst TV Networks Wiki and Bad TV Channels Wiki
 * 7) Crappy Software Wiki and Good Software Wiki
 * 8) Abysmal Hardware Wiki and mh:excellenthardware:Excellent Hardware Wiki
 * 9) mh:genericandoverusedphrases:Generic & Overused Phrases Wiki
 * 10) mh:worstthemeparksandattractions:Worst Theme Parks and Attractions Wiki and mh:awesomethemeparksandattractions:Awesome Theme Parks and Attractions Wiki
 * 11) Trashy Celebrities Wiki and Fabulous Celebrities Wiki
 * 12) Ugly Logos Wikia and Beautiful Logos Wiki
 * 13) The social media reception wikis
 * 14) Vile Plays Wiki and Exceptional Plays Wiki
 * 15) mh:closedwebsites:Closed Websites Wiki

Wiki ideas

 * 1) No Good Products Wiki

Wiki idea blacklist
Since some people think that various reception wiki ideas are bad ideas, I am going to list some wiki ideas that people think are bad ideas and should be forbidden. In terms for what it means if a wiki idea is on this blacklist, it does not mean they can't be created, but simply that they cannot be linked to in any article on a Qualitipedia wiki nor can they be affiliated in any way. Here are my ideas for the blacklist:
 * 1) Foods and drinks - Subjective due to people's different tastes.
 * 2) Art - Same reasons as foods and drinks, and also can have different messages and meanings, etc.
 * 3) Sports and sport stars - Most likely would be biased, as it is hard to explain why sports are good. In terms for sport stars, it takes games and competition too seriously, and also the negative wiki would criticise people just for being bad at a game despite that being bad at a game is not a thing you deserve to be criticised for. Sure, you could talk about people who play unfairly, but there aren't that many people who have been proven to play unfairly.
 * 4) Any wiki focusing on users - Usually pointless, as users are criticised for the things they create on websites, and therefore, there should be a wiki about the content itself, not the users. In terms for wikis about users who are bad/good people, they are not "reception wikis" because whether or not someone is a bad/good person is based on facts, not reception or popular opinions. Their acts should be discussed in an encyclopedia such as Internet Villains Wiki, not a reception wiki.
 * 5) Fandoms and hatedoms - It is almost impossible to figure out whether or not the majority of a fandom is toxic or healthy, and the negative wiki will most likely cause drama.
 * 6) Actions of any kind - Whether or not something is a good thing to do or not is usually either based on facts or is outright controversial and will cause drama.
 * 7) Stores - Belong on the company wikis, Horrible Companies Wiki and Marvelous Companies Wiki.
 * 8) Any wiki about large places (cities, towns, states, regions, etc.) and communities - Lack of reception and often controversial.