Requests for Comment/Blubabluba9990 for Qualitipedia bureaucrat

Due to the resignation of both Raidarr and DarkMatterMan4500, it seems like these wikis may be doomed. However, there may be a light at the end of the tunnel. I, Blubabluba9990, am requesting Bureaucrat rights across Qualitipedia. I have many good edits on all nine Qualitipedia wikis, and I promise that I will help finish what Raidarr and DarkMatterMan4500 started and lead these wikis into a new golden age! Blubabluba9990 (talk) 13:44, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Given your history, I don't think you've done enough to even qualify you as a bureaucrat. I already passed the torch to  2 days ago. --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 14:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Given your history on these wikis, I don't think an explanation is needed as to why I'm opposing this. --Blazikeye535 (talk) 15:21, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) You mean well, but your history of destructively insistent behavior on how Qualitipedia should be handled suggests that you might not be a fit for this position. Besides, we're likely going to break even with the number of bureaucrats we need right now as Bukkit's RfC is looking successful, so a fifth bureaucrat would mean staff imbalance. Marxo Grouch  (talk) 15:35, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) If your idea of becoming a bureaucrat is by making an RfC, then I don’t think I can trust you. DeadPixel (talk) 16:57, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * It’s a central wiki, what do you expect? When I’m ready for admin rights, I will make a RfC here. Moisty (talk) (CentralAuth) | Posted at 20:46:10, 15 August 2022 (UTC) Yup4au.png
 * 1) Your history of disruptiveness, incivility, low efforts to improve your contributions, difficulty to take opinions and in Marxo's words, "destructively insistent behavior", shows me that you are not ready to manage Qualitipedia in the position of bureaucrat. Zangler (talk) 17:14, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) I respect you as a user, but I don't think you'd be able to be a bureaucrat. FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 20:48, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 3) Per all the votes above, not only is your long-term incivility and destructively insistent behavior (just like what Marxo said) the reason you're unfitting for bureaucrat rights, but the way how you handled stuff in Qualitipedia also proves that as well. DragoniteSignatureImage.png Dragonitetypeface.png]] DragoniteTalk.png]] DragoniteContribs.png]] 22:17, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 4) Various users, moderators, administrators and burecrats have said that your story (edits, actions and disruptiveness) in this wikis is everything but liked and respected person.  22:08, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 5) Per the above. Whatever I said in my original abstain still applies here, as the user has provided me no wikis he moderates.  00:50, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Abstain
I don't feel like you are a good candidate for bureaucrat. From what I've seen, you have no mod experience with these wikis, and I don't think you would abuse your powers, but you may make changes that have a negative impact on the community, albeit in good faith. 14:51, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I do have mod experience on other wikis though. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 15:03, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * List please? 15:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)


 * 1) How about you get moderator rights and we go from there? Moisty (talk) (CentralAuth) | Posted at 16:30:37, 15 August 2022 (UTC) Yup4au.png