Blog:Regarding "poorly written" or "biased" pages

I am sick and tired of pages being deleted or marked for deletion due to being "poorly written" or "biased", without actually attempting to improve the page. The purpose of a wiki is a website that anyone can edit. That includes improving pages that are poorly written or biased. In addition, not everyone is good at writing. If you feel that a page needs to be improved, then improve it rather than just slapping a deletion tag on it. And no "moving it to a sandbox". It just seems lazy to delete a page rather than actually try to improve it. I think this was the underlying problem that my past RfC was overlooking. This doesn't even require an RfC and is just a simple sentiment change. Wikipedia calls this being bold and that is a sentiment that users here at Qualitipedia should adopt as well. And not every single page needs to be extremely long and detailed. In summary, if a page is poorly written or biased, then actually improve the page rather than just slapping a deletion tag on it or deleting the page.