Requests for Comment/Community ban for MarioBobFan

MarioBobFan is a user who has been a part of QP since August 6, 2021, and has proven to be not only one of, if not the most disruptive user as of recent, but also one of the most disruptive users in all of QP history. I'll provide numerous examples:
 * 1) His track record of making quality edits is abysmal. He adds incredibly nitpicky or sugarcoating BQs and GQs to pages, and oftentimes leaves notes demanding that other users don't undo his edits, as seen here. The most notorious example is adding "The game/movie/show can be considered a "so bad its good" game/movie/show" as a RQ to countless pages on the negative wikis.
 * 2) Constantly edit wars with other users, and often throws fits whenever his edits get undone. He also edit wars over trivial matters such as custom headers.
 * 3) Adding to point #2, he simply can't handle anything that doesn't go his way and can't take any form of criticism. One example is this talk page where he received a warning. He not only claims that he is "done" with the wikis over a warning, but also indirectly threatened to resort to sockpuppetry if he were to be blocked. He also threatened to make an RfC to reopen the website wikis should they close.
 * 4) Speaking of RfCs, he made a bunch of poorly written and invalid RfCs here, and ignored a warning telling him to stop making these invalid RfCs. He even opposed one of his own RfCs.
 * 5) Has poor grammar, which is most evident in the diff I provided where he throws a fit.
 * 6) Often tends to add one character per edit to rack up his edit count, which Dmehus describes as "unnecessary flooding" in a warning from him.
 * 7) Falsely claims that a lot of users believe he is a good user, which has been debunked twice.
 * 8) Created a blog on GMW which was just blatant plagiarism from another user's sandbox.
 * 9) Tends to make sandboxes about stuff that hasn't been released yet, which is against the rules. He also defends this unconstructive practice.
 * 10) Instead of letting admins look at candidates for deletion, he instead removed the deletion tag and moves these pages to blogs, which can lead to a clog of poorly made blogs that should've been deleted.
 * 11) Perhast his worst act is inserting nonsensical info about The Loud House into pages that have nothing to do with said show, which is borderline vandalism. This what led to him getting indefinitely blocked from all the wikis in the first place.

With all these points in mind, it's clear he isn't here to help build the wikis. Despite countless blocks across the wikis for this mass disruption, there has been very little to no improvement whatsoever in his behavior. He has clearly blown every second chance he has been given, and will most likely blow every future one as well. This is why I propose that he needs to be banned from QP once and for all. --Blazikeye535 (talk) 18:41, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) if youve already seen the comments from him on this RfC then i probably dont need to go into detail about why hes really immature Toppy (talk) 22:49, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) As being the first supporter, I can say for a fact MarioBobFan needs to go. He is an absolute nimrod and Loud obsessed fanboy who thinks we'll keep giving him chances. But we can't give him anymore chances, I mean, read the entire list of bad thing's he's done! I can especially say I've fallen victim to MarioBobFan's grasp. I even got banned for obsessing over him. But even with that, it's safe to say- he's not a good user, he's not helpful, seemingly no one likes him, and he seemingly can't get over The Loud House going downhill. I feel removing him from Qualitipedia once and for all will start calming things down. Sure, there's more users like him, but we'll deal with them soon, and we WON'T make the same mistake we did with dealing MarioBobFan, giving them way to many second chances til they believe they can go on forever. I just want all this MarioBobFan stuff to end soon enough, and it will help the state of Qualitipedia, especially Loathsome Characters wiki. It will also act as a good reminder for the future- Don't let someone go if they don't really mean it. --Reviweing97Shows (talk) 18:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 3) MarioBobFan deserves to be blocked permanently for being an immature user overall, he should of never gotten a second chance, he doesn't deserve any more chances, he will never learn his lesson from all the shit we've warned him in the past, he'll just continue to act like the way he does and brag about how wonderful of a user he is, when he clearly isn't. JigglypuffGuy04 (talk) 19:00 AM, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 4) This kid's practices have been getting on everybody's last nerves. He constantly makes poor edits to pages that add nothing (most of them are nitpicky and sometimes even clog up page history with one character edits), sparks edit wars when they're undone, has an incredibly questionable mindset (see here where he states that he kept adding info to the Loud House page just because he wanted it to be featured), demonstrates a limited capacity for understanding criticism (those two links where he claimed he was a good user and the topic where he stated he was leaving over one warning say all), and he is even prone to wasting the stewards' time (he was blocked from the stewards' noticeboard for repeatedly making topic about matters that don't need steward intervention). These acts speak volumes about how low his maturity is, which is why a community ban would be idyllic. Marxo Grouch  (talk) 19:16, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 5) I'm rather surprised that we have put up with him for this long, and the fact that stewards had to get involved a few times coupled with everything listed here, it's clear he isn't here to contribute. Lying about what other people think of him, wanting to revert decisions he personally disagrees with multiple times, and overall not being able to accept any form of advice or fair criticisms and just continuing to make bad edits is already enough on it's own. I think we've put up with this long enough. Wing Commander confed star.pngTigerBlazer  19:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 6) MarioBob has been doing nothing but disruptive edits as of recently. I think a ban needs to happen.    19:26, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 7) I've given this guy the benefit of the doubt here, but after seeing him constantly edit-war with another editor (or multiple editors in this case), is less than sufficient to issue a ban against him. However, seeing how he has continued to constantly annoy other users, as well as other things that were mentioned in this RfC, gets progressively stronger from here. He makes even Eric Bagwell look better in comparison. I'm sorry, but I'm supporting this one, but in its weakest form, seeing how questionable your actions were. --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 20:14, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 8) We should go through with this ban. However, should it really be (presumably) indefinite? He’s, what, 13? Possibly even younger (which is an Miraheze violation in of itself)? Maybe he should be banned until he turns 16. I think that’s reasonable. He’ll probably be more mature by then. Plus, it’s not like he’s actively damaging the community. He’s just an annoyance. MoistyPorky.jpeg Moisty (talk) (CentralAuth) | Posted at 20:30:50, 24 June 2022 (UTC) MoistyPorky.jpeg
 * 9) My experience with MarioBobFan involves nothing but reverted edits, multiple warnings and a few blocks across the Qualitipedia wikis due to every observation numbered by  in the proposal, as well as the reasons given by the supporters above. There was no doubt I'd be supporting this too.  22:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 10) Not a contributor to the QP Wikis or anything, but as someone who reads them, and has done so since the creation of this account [this applies to the Discord too], I've seen plenty of MBF's... unpleasant actions [mainly through the Discord]. I've never liked him; I've seen him as annoying, loathsome, repugnant, and generally all-around annoying. The observations that Blazikeye laid out in the proposal seem to further support this, and after everything I've seen and heard about this guy [including the reasons others have laid out], I am coming out of my normal lurking state to say I will support this ban. Static Discharge (talk) 22:21, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 11) Yeah. I agree with this, I think MarioBobFan should be banned. He's been making stupid edits and I'm getting really tired of the drama he caused, especially since he kept on getting warnings and blocks, etc, and he still hasn't learned his lesson, even to this very day. Extreme support for this. Kpop And Earthbound Fanatic 22:48, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 12) Sorry, MarioBob, but you've done too many questionable things to keep you around on our wikis anymore. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 3:57 PM, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 13) This constant disruption has to stop, and unfortunately for him he chose not to stop it himself. BookFandumb1 (talk) 23:09, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 14) MarioBobFan, you need to stop doing a bunch of bad things, and look how much you did. There is no way we are gonna keep you in the wikis due to you being so obsessed with The Loud House as well as acting so childish. If we didn't give you a lot of chances, you would have learn from your mistakes yet you waste them all. PlantyB0i (talk) 6:18 PM, 24 June 2022 (CDT)
 * 15) Do I even have to explain? He shouldn't come back to this wiki. No second chances, no opportunity to appeal, no anything. Bye, Felicia. TheRealEldegoss (talk) 11:20 PM, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 16) I really have nothing to explain but the fact that he's very immature and annoying in general, as this overall makes me wonder about his age, and not to mention for the fact he kept making a bunch of invalid RfCs which all obviously got rejected, and even threatened to make one about reopening the website wikis if they close just to counter the one we have here. Dragonite (talk) 00:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 17) I strongly disagree with the idea of banning him, as you haven't really given him a long temporary block or anything. However, what about a cross-wiki block for a year or so? I think that would be more fair. FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 23:46, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 18) Similar case to the ApexAgunomu ban on Meta, they have been given too many chances, promising that they would change, however they continue the same behavior. Same with the oppose, there is immaturity. As Raidarr has said in their talk page, MarioBobFan is a CIR user. I’d personally like to see the user take a break, and come back, ready to make constructive edits. -- Cheers, Justin Aves (talk • contribs • global • rights) 00:50, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) I am MarioBobFan, and I do not want to be blocked as I do not want to be blocked from any wiki in the slightest. MarioBobFan (talk) 21:43, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Very strong argument you have there. - Reviweing97Shows (talk) 1:11, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * This is not helping your case at all. This is not anyone else's fault, you're the one who caused all these problems, and you're not taking responsibility! - DarthMaul570 (talk) 22:22, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1)  good ol’ Qualitipedia, always resorting to the big guns when there are clear solutions. He was given ONE block that was lifted, why not block him again? If he continues then you should resort to this. Also reason 5. You can’t be serious with the grammar? But then again, we have him being immature. -- Cheers, Justin Aves (talk • contribs • global • rights) 00:18, 25 June 2022 (UTC) Striked do to my support. -- Cheers, Justin Aves (talk • contribs • global • rights) 00:50, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The fact someone actually managed to oppose makes me laugh. Well, here's the thing. He's already been blocked not ONCE. Maybe like 2 or 3. Besides, his rain of terror is too much for just a block. So good "argument" you have there. -Reviweing97Shows (talk) 7:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments
Comments are permanently disabled due to continued incivility.

'''If you must for example ask a strictly clerical question regarding this RfC or how the ban works, you may use the discussion tab. Commentary there which is out of scope will be removed.'''