Requests for Comment/Require users to create a topic before changing reception

NOTE: I don't mean custom headers. Just putting this out here to avoid confusion. I've seen lots of edit wars going on between headers being changed (Teen Titans GO!, Tomb Raider: AOD, Sonic Forces, etc.), so to combat this, I think it should be required that users make a topic on the talk page before changing the reception. The way this will work is simple. The user who wants to change the reception creates a poll, and people vote on the headers (either average or bad). The majority wins. 02:58, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  While I don't like custom headings in general, I don't want to flip flop on the topic of whether they should be allowed or not. That being said, I agree that there needs to be some sort of regulation with them. However, my support is weak since I'm not sure how this could be enforced. Marxo Grouch  (talk) 15:27, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I wasn't talking about custom headers, I meant changing headers and the reception. (i.e. GQ/BQ to WIR/BQ))   19:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * My bad. Anyway, I am upgrading to a because agree that there should be a discussion before people go about changing headings. I also think that this could apply to seasons of shows as well. Marxo Grouch  (talk) 19:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) I'm going to withdraw. This isn't the right way to stop edit warring.   11:43, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1) While I'm for the idea of ending edit wars regarding headings (i.e. "Why It Sucks" and "Bad Qualities"), I kinda think making a rule like this is a little over-the-top, IMO. Besides, we can always lock the pages temporarily, or permanently, depending on the severity of the edit wars. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 1:15 AM June 16, 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) I have a mixed feeling about this, while I also want to end edit wars related to headers just as what SSK said, I also think this is going a bit too far, so I think the way to actually solve this problem is to just show proof of the actual reception through any review websites that's considered a reliable source to the staff first, then they can just review it, and give them an OK if it's proven to be valid. Dragonite (talk) 10:34, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 3) The idea sounds promising, but I feel mixed on this because there is such a thing as locking a page for edit warring. Afterwards admins can review the reception to see whether or not it's reliable, then change the heading appropriately (while also possibly adding a warning against changing the heading). Marxo Grouch  (talk) 14:48, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 4) *That warning against changing the heading is already banned. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 7:01 PM June 16 2022 (UTC)