Requests for Comment/Wikipedia link in infoboxes

This is based on this blog I posted about a month ago.

I've seen many pages many pages where the subject's name, which is the leading word of pages, is a hyperlink to the Wikipedia page of the subject. While it is great having the link to Wikipedia's entry on the subject, it is quite awkward having the leading word being a hyperlink, let alone a link to another tertiary source. I don't think this ever became a Qualitipedia standard though.

My proposal is to add at the bottom of infoboxes the Wikipedia link instead. In the infobox template, there is a parameter for Wikipedia page title, since not every page on Qualitipedia has the same page title as Wikipedia on the same subject. If the parameter is left blank, then the infobox won't have a Wikipedia link (for when the subject doesn't have a Wikiepia entry). - 19:38, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) as the creator  -  19:35, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) Even though we do already link it at the start of the article, doing that is kind of random, so it is better if we do it like this. FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 22:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
 * My point is, having a Wikipedia link at the start of an article is quite awkward, especially that it is a link to another source. It may make the reader think the page is a summary of the Wikipedia article (or maybe not, but still rather awkward writing). -  02:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) A minuscule addition that doesn't pursue a big change when compared to other RfC's, but is nevertheless something positive, and much better than the other alternative Atomicstar mentioned.  12:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)