Requests for Comment/Close the lego sets wikis

{{ClosedRfC|Invalid. We cannot act on these wikis. Please contact the respective local managements. In addition it's not good practice to close wikis merely because you see no personal use or activity to them, when they neither affect you nor your image. --Raidarr (talk) 13:08, 25 December 2021 (UTC) |

These wiki are pointless, have no hope, have only like 1 or 2 pages and are incredibly inactive.

There are the Fantastic Lego Sets Wiki and the Garbage Lego Sets wiki, all terribly inactive, lack content and have no hope. These need to be closed, these wikis aren't even really needed. Garbage Lego Sets wiki has the most no hope, only 1 page and no activity, same with the fantastic Lego sets wiki, both have almost no pages, no activity and no hope.

Support

 * 1) . Per nominator LunarChroniclesXIV (talk) 02:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 2)  I have a feeling that those wikis are pretty much like the toy wikis, which were also closed down due to lack of utility. Marxo Grouch  (talk) 01:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) - this request for comment is invalid. The Lego Set wikis have nothing to do with Qualitipedia administratively. This request must be made on the local wikis you are discussing and prominently advertised to be handled locally.  should close this request as a matter of routine for this reason. --Raidarr (talk) 01:41, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I've looked into these wikis further, since nobody's linked them I had to dig a little. I believe this request means the Garbage Legos Wiki and the Fantastic Lego Sets Wiki. These were obviously made independent of each other and have different staff, though in both cases a majority of those mentioned on the front page/actually in the staff list are completely inactive. On Garbage Legos, is the only active and available local manager and the only one on the associated active users list. In that case, it is their call as the one to have reopened it. On Fantastic Lego Sets, nobody can be considered active. The only reason it is still open is because DarkMatterMan blocked a prolific sockpuppet across many wikis at once. The last actual content contribution was DuchessTheSponge making a page on July 15th, with no other content contributions since at least May. These wikis are obviously dead, but it is not QP Central's place to close them. Since it has nothing to do with QP you're really just better off leaving them alone as they are doomed to expire naturally through the Miraheze Dormancy Policy, although maybe not if DarkMatterMan continues local blocks for FLSW and JrStudios reopens GLW. But again, that's not your business really. You could just as soon ignore them. The only exception is if they violate other global policies, which I see no evidence for. --Raidarr (talk) 14:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Not only is this request invalid because these are not part of Qualitipedia, but also I strongly disagree. I can see why the toy wikis were closed, but that is because most toys don't have enough pointers and also, they're somewhat childish. However, Lego is a very famous brand and also, I think that a reasonable amount of people would be interested in lego set wikis. In addition, pages about Lego sets will have more pointers than pages about other toys, because lego sets can contain a lot of things in them. If I'm going to be honest, I'm actually not even sure if the wikis being "childish" is as much of a problem as people think; some people may want to write about the toys they liked when they were kids because they're good memories. FatBurn0000 (talk) 21:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) - I am only doing what I can do. These wikis are hard to operate due to my house’s lego ban. I would like if an admin could take over, though. JrStudios (talk) 14:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 3)  While there is only one known active admin, these wikis should be given a fighting chance since they technically aren't part of Qualitipedia. Marxo Grouch  (talk) 20:33, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 4)  Their are not part of the Qualitipedia, meaning that we can't decide their fate. King Dice (talk) 21:46, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Abstain
}}
 * 1)  - I don't really care whether they are opened or closed, to be honest. Mr. Jay 641  (📄) 4:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 2)  Changing my vote to abstain. It is barely active, but it isn’t part of Qualitipedia so it is up to the admin on the lego wikis Atomicstar (talk) 02:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)