What Qualitipedia is not

Qualitipedia is often misused. The main purpose of Qualitipedia is to compile public reception on media into clear articles. There are some things Qualitipedia does not stand for, provided in extension to the global rules. 'Media' is the subject of any given wiki (movie, game, TV show...)

Qualitipedia is not a site to enforce your opinions
We respect personal or even unpopular opinions (you are free to place them in a blog), but main articles must reflect common and clear points made on the media. If there is a significant fringe argument that can be sourced, it can be placed in its own section.

If this becomes an issue, discuss on the relevant talk page. Be civil and use valid arguments. An admin may decide the result. Do not edit war with any user if there is disagreement, since this is a quick path to block. Only civility and valid reasoning will win you the argument.

Qualitipedia is not a site about people
Our focus is the merits of media based on arguments made. Although articles can be made in support of a wiki's topic, articles are not permitted regarding users, online personalities or real people. If you see one, point it out to an admin. Along with this, an article should not focus on individuals and the points cannot be mostly made up of the community only. If the community is a problem, consider points about how the platform caused the problematic community.

Qualitipedia is not politically partisan
Qualitipedia rejects political partisanship. Our focus is on content and media on its own merits, and ideology is only relevant for how it may have strongly affected a piece of media's reception. This is a touchy subject; defer to review from the appropriate qualitipedia staff when appropriate.