Blog:In defense of my blog

I admit Raidarr made some good points in his blog, but there are still a few other issues with the merge that I would like to point out: So Raidarr may have disputed some of the points, but I stand strong in my belief that a merge would not do any good for the wikis.
 * 1) First off, Raidarr's disputing claim for the first one simply said that there were not always three wikis. While that is true, it does not address the problematic issue of changing the basic framework for the reception wikis.
 * 2) If everything was on one wiki, it would be hard to tell whether a piece of media is good or bad. You would actually have to look at the template first. It would be easier to keep track of what media is good or bad if they are on separate wikis.
 * 3) Raidarr never addressed the fact that the Qualitipedia wikis are not the only reception wikis. If we merge the Qualitipedia wikis into one wiki, then the other reception wikis would have to do so as well.
 * 4) He is also ignoring one key factor: The wikis have been binary since the very beginning, and there have been no technical problems that have arisen from binary wikis.