Requests for Comment/My post-closure plan for the wikis

Given that Qualitipedia is about to be closed in less than a week, I am suggesting my plan for a possible way to revive the wikis. This was originally suggested by TigerBlazer though I have tweaked it a bit. I call it Operation Unity. Here is what I propose: This should hopefully end up being a more functional revival of the current wikis, and will please the users who want to remain on the wikis. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:21, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) I will create four wikis: Qualitipedia Games Wiki (QGW), Qualitipedia Movies Wiki (QMW), Qualitipedia Shows Wiki (QSW), and Qualitipedia Literature Wiki (QLW).
 * 2) Bukkit will take the dumps for the eight wikis and import them onto the corresponding four wikis based on the type of media (CGW and AGW onto QGW, AMW and GMW onto QMW, TS&EW and BS&EW onto QSW, and DLW and MLW onto QLW).
 * 3) The new wikis will use a unary system of reception rather than a binary system. Most media will be allowed, and will have three headers for Bad Qualities, Good Qualities, and Neutral Qualities. This should reduce the amount of arguments over what pages go on which wiki.

Support

 * 1) As proposer. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:21, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Isn't it funny how Bluba is the only supporter for most of his RfCs? DeadPixel (talk) 22:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't surprise me. He still somehow sees them as "reliable" despite the fact that it isn't. Trying to "improve" it at this point is polishing a turd. Trevor807 (talk) 23:02, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1)  I think it's a good idea considering that A LOT of users like editing these wikis. Szczypak2005 (talk) 12:20, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Who? Progressively deteriorating addicts/bozos? Portrock1566 (talk) 14:11, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Nobody is addicted, just a lot of people still like this place even though there are more RfC supporters, so naming people who like editing Qualitipedia's pages is rude. Szczypak2005 (talk) 16:25, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) This barely fixes the flaws of the wikis. These are not bad ideas, but there's a reason why we're (likely) opting for closure.  19:30, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) We have one of the worst reputations on the internet and dragged Miraheze down with us.  Plus you fail to address the bigger problem which was the immense drama we've had over the years.  Constant fights, argument and excessive need for professionalism over fun has made the wikis extremely unreliable and I haven't even used them to find games on my Retroid Pocket 2.  And if they revive, the same problems are just going to keep on coming and nothing will ever improve.  Qualitipedia just needs to end for good.  ElementalHeroes (talk) 19:43, 21 September 2022 (UTC)ElementalHeroes.
 * These wikis have to be professional if we are going to be the future of reception of entertainment. How else will we get a collective opinion of reception? Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:59, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I got all the games I download for my Retroid off YouTubers, various websites and even some casual dialogue, but not QP. ElementalHeroes (talk) 20:42, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * For one, I'd think that less than 90% of our userbase aren't. As for issue two, Metacritic. 20:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * "These wikis have to be professional if we are going to be the future of reception of entertainment." Dude, don't you remember the time when Allistayrian tried to enforce professionalism onto the wikis by mass deleting pages, inspiring other users to do pointless things like recreating already-existing pages, increasing the regulations of the "Featured" template, as well as even co-creating the useless "Good" template? Yeah, most of that didn't turn out well, did it? The Reception Wikis were never meant to be professional; just a place for carefree and laid-back fun like they were in the FANDOM days. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 11:50, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) DUDE!!!! Grust wants these wikis gone and that's it, when the hell would you just shut up? I mean, you are literally the SammyClassicSonicFan of Qualitipedia at this point, you wouldn't even be like this if it weren't for your global block on Fandom DuchessTheSponge (talk) 19:52, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) This entire RfC is basically undermining the entire purpose for closing the wikis, it sounds like you're desperately trying your best to make the sure the purpose of closure gets immediately overturned when there is already a lot more support for closing than keeping in place. And what if a unary system is put in place? It's not addressing the bulk of the structural, conceptual, audience, and  problems that all reception wikis inevitably have that's been greatly detailed in the supports and proposal of the closure RfC itself. And at the same time, dumping all the stuff into one wiki for each media is not going to work since they are fairly established wikis that asking to put them all together in one is asking for hours upon hours of reworking before you can even get close to working on the wikis themselves. It’s simply infeasible. Quit being such a fucking baby for once and move on with your damn life. QP had its chance, it's been given tens of chances, and no matter what has happened, they always end up in failure. They're beyond repair at this point, and I am legitimately scared for how little you're actually doing to accept this change. Opposers and supporters are concerned about you for a reason, please let this go. Wing Commander confed star.pngTigerBlazer  20:06, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 3) No way. I'm not going onboard with your post-closure plan for these wikis. If I were you, I would realize that there were a buttload of flaws present in QP and agree with its closure (alongside the closure of its Reception Wikis). ShawnTehLogoBoi (talk) 20:13, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 4) If an admin is reading this, you should close this RfC as invalid because one, as other opposers have said, this doesn't address the main issues with QP, and two, Bluba said in the comments that he'll still make these wikis if this RfC isn't successful, which makes this whole RfC pointless. DeadPixel (talk) 20:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 5) Look, Bluba, I get that you enjoy using QP, but no matter what we try and do to improve this place, it's never, and I repeat, NEVER gonna improve itself. You can't just forcefully try everything you can to prevent it from closing down, just face the fact that QP will be going bye-bye and there's nothing you can do about it. JigglypuffGuy04 (talk) 21:49 21 September 2022 (BST)
 * 6) Per TigerBlazer. Not only does this proposal not fix any of the issues with Qualitipedia, but it also undermines closing it down. It's clear from this that you really are obsessed with this place and can't accept closure in any way. Marxo Grouch  (talk) 20:53, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree with this, and I even gave Bluba a final warning on his talk page so he gets blocked by admins per incompetence. TF3RDL (talk) 01:27, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I hate to break it to you but as much as I agree with the warning, that's vigilantism coming from a non-admin, which his just as cringe as Double B. Portrock1566 (talk) 01:31, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) You already opposed the closure, so what even is the point of this? This proposal is literally no different from the current Wikis. With how deep you've dugged, the only way to save yourself now is to surrender, and accept that nothing about your love of these "Wikis" is normal. Portrock1566 (talk) 21:16, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) Per what Tiger and the others said. SuperStreetKombat (talk 2:18, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * No explanation needed. —Blazikeye535 (talk) 21:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) In all honesty, this move feels really unnecessary and it contradicts the original RfC with it's overwhelming support to closing down Qualtipedia on Miraheze. Tamagotchifan35 (talk) 21:29, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) Per all the votes above, no explanation needed from me either aside from the fact this is completely unnecessary and pointless to make and pretty much undermines the purpose of the RfC we got. DragoniteSignatureImage.png Dragonitetypeface.png]] DragoniteTalk.png]] DragoniteContribs.png]] 22:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Per all votes above. Il (talk) 22:35, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) With all due respect, Bluba, I'd just accept the closure and move on with my life if I were you, especially with the fact so many people support that RfC, not just myself. Grust wants them all closed, but you wouldn't listen to those sites' founder. The fact you refuse to listen to him says a lot (and also reminds me of when Washington pleaded for a lack of political parties but nobody listened). As for my actual reasoning, same as everyone else; you're defeating the RfC's point here. Trevor807 (talk) 22:58, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) Short answer: F**k you Bluba, this is why no one wants you around. Long answer: everyone said what I wanted to so I won't reinvent the wheel, but please, there's no reason for this. Even though I still stick to my beliefs that not all of the opposers are bad people, you're one of the very few that deserve to be called out. War Incarnate (talk) 23:12, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Here's the thing: while I would not oppose a reboot of QP, the reason I am opposing it here is that it's on Miraheze & the way it's being done makes zero fucking sense. Yeah, you know why this is a bad idea. War Incarnate (talk)
 * Saying "F**k you Bluba, this is why no one wants you around" is rather uncivil. FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 23:17, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not approving of what War Incarnate said, but in their defense, Bluba's insanity is sorely testing a lot of people's patience. I myself am holding in a LOT of shit in that regard.  ElementalHeroes (talk) 23:25, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) I do support the idea of some kind of reboot, but I already have ideas for one, so this is kind of unnecessary. FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 23:28, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) "You're ugly, you're disgusting, I'm gonna kill you, give me $200" —Dr. Phil GyrineZ (talk) 23:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Again, please be civil. FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 23:49, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) This doesn’t even need to be a rfc, honestly there’s no reason for this not to be a blog anyway. ScratchCoder (talk) 00:09, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * As much as I don't want to get involved to whatever shit Bluba has been doing here recently, I honestly think that these wikis are unnecessary; knowing that the wikis are bound to close in a few days. Skias (talk) 02:49, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) I don't see how this would help. The fact that you don't understand why qualitipedia‎ is closing and your antagonizing behavior towards users who support the RfC is enough to show that you are not the person reliable to come up with a solution. Learn to grow up and quit acting like a baby. Sofaking we todd it (talk) 03:24, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) As a supporter of the closing QP RfC, this contradicts the aforementioned RfC (and the hashtag #SaveMiraheze, which means improving Miraheze's reputation back to the former glory and be better than FANDOM) and I'm certainly there are people including me here are fed up with his disruptive behavior and obsession with Qualitipedia, which became a toxic wasteland. Bluba's disruptive behavior (like creating pointless RfCs like this one) is so bad that it can only be described by a disgruntled MOAB Glue shooting the glue at the trains to stop the exodus. TF3RDL (talk) 07:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)