Requests for Comment/Add AniRightsScam to our lineup (animal rights database)

{{ClosedRfC|This RfC has been closed early because:
 * The construction is nearly broken; future writers should attempt to make less headers that do not invite duplicate comments including supports and opposes to make the same point,
 * As a matter of mh:meta:Content policy, this idea is not practical on Miraheze,
 * We currently have no means to host an external wiki on the QP network, and anything like that should be its own discussion,
 * While this was not allowed to remain open for long, it is the administration's reasonable belief that this idea would either be unpopular or not interesting enough to pursue on QP in this form based on previous discussion of the topic.

The viability of this idea on Miraheze should be addressed on Miraheze Meta, where it would meet the strongest roadblock. Discussions for hosting this outside of Miraheze can be done via blog or discussion thread. Only when there is a future for the idea and an interest from the administration would it be appropriate to make an RfC to try and get it integrated into Qualitipedia. --Raidarr (talk) 19:21, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

New wiki
This will show about a new wiki. We need to get Miraheze to allow the wiki.

Other hosting site

 * It's against the CoC, so it's best as far away from here as possible. TigerBlazer (talk) 19:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The concept alone sounds like something that could get someone in hot water with Miraheze staff, so I wouldn't try it here. Marxo Grouch (talk) 19:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Not on the Reception Wikis

 * Your wiki theme has nothing to do with the reception of a piece of media. TigerBlazer (talk) 19:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I can just tell from the concept that it isn't going to follow the general structure of the reception wikis, therefore it isn't a true reception wiki. Plus we don't really need any more reception wikis right now. Marxo Grouch (talk) 19:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Reception Wikis
}}
 * It isn't a reception wiki, so it has no place on our network. We have enough wikis anyway. It would work better as a standalone thing. TigerBlazer (talk) 17:42, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Exactly as TigerBlazer said. If it isn't a reception wiki, then it's its own thing. Marxo Grouch (talk) 19:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)