Requests for Comment/Bukkit for Qualitipedia Bureaucrat

Hello, I am Bukkit. You've probably heard of me in the Qualitipedia Discord server. Currently, I am requesting to have bureaucrat rights, but first, please hear me out. There are mass-resignations happening, with Zangler stating he will resign once he finishes what he has to do, as well as many other users due to issues within Qualitipedia. The main reason why I am requesting to be a bureaucrat is to reform/create policies as a way to fix Qualitipedia. Although raidarr has done most of the work, there are still areas that require work on.

As stated, the main rationale of me becoming a bureaucrat would be to reform the bureaucracy of the network and continue to hold the staff members accountabilities for their actions. I'd also like to create an adequate revdel and blocking policy. Another plan on my Bureaucrat agenda would be having staff being competent, consistent, and have good judgment.

If y'all don't want me as a bureaucrat, understandable, have a great day. Maybe I was too BOLD.

And as a note for voters, please don't vote because you like me, vote based off of the rationale provided and how you think I will preform as a bureaucrat. Thank you.

Support

 * 1) You convinced me! We need the most help we can get at the moment and if what you say is true, if you have the will to complete all those technical tasks as bureaucrat, then I'm all for it.  20:26, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) Moisty (talk) (CentralAuth) | Posted at 20:52:27, 12 August 2022 (UTC) Yup4au.png
 * 3)    21:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 4) Sounds reasonable especially in these times. Rem69 21:45 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 5) You're a pretty chill dude mate, as you've mentioned some great ideas on the server before, are heavily involved in the community, and you aren't difficult to communicate with at all (something all the staff should have), so there's no real reason why you shouldn't. Wing Commander confed star.pngTigerBlazer  22:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 6) Sounds like you have the necessary willpower to hold such a position so here's my support. Marxo Grouch  (talk) 22:28, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 7) You're easily one of the chillest users here, and that you're also fun to talk with, especially on Discord. DragoniteSignatureImage.png Dragonitetypeface.png]] DragoniteTalk.png]] DragoniteContribs.png]] 22:45, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * As Raidarr has said, 5 should be good enough as long as we are all on the same page. Your experience with Miraheze Meta, as well as the intentions you stated in this RfC make you a pretty promising candidate for a bureaucrat. —Blazikeye535 (talk) 23:14, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Eh, why not, have a . To be honest and as to how I think you will perform, I don't have much to go on and mainly I hope you will step up above my assumptions. It's an opportunity to get hands on leadership skill and be a mediating influence against hotheadedness, which I feel is a risk with the current arrangement. If you do work on the bureaucracy and keep admins (and your peers!) accountable as you say, you'll be doing a key service. On top of that, try to get a good circle of feedback going, even if it's three out of five at a given time. Best of luck, especially since the odds of losing now are incredibly low. Fun fact, this would make you the second most legitimate bureaucrat the network has seen, being voted into position with broad support and input when most others including all of your existing peers were not. --Raidarr (talk) 23:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Sure, why not. FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 03:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 2)  Although I'm glad to be free from all of this stress (considering I had the leadership title for over 18 months), I don't suppose Bukkit could be a new bureaucrat. I did however resign from my position as a bureaucrat and as leader, considering my lack of motivation and drive, and other things like that. Also that ridiculous show I displayed last night definitely was the butter on the toast. Some users were in the right to doubt me, and I don't plan on using that title for a long time from now. But anyway, sure, why not? --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 21:52, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Bureaucrat is a network wide position; if you didn't resign across the network then you didn't really resign. --Raidarr (talk) 11:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Although I am not in discord (as per privacy reasons), I do think that you have the temperament to be a bureaucrat of this network, when others are considering to resign. Good luck for being a bureaucrat, and take this as an opportunity to get hands on leadership skill, as  said. -Matttest (talk) 07:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * 2)  Whoever we can get. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 13:45, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1) Sorry, but I don't know about this. He questions a lot of reasonable decisions on QP, including mine, so I don't know if he can be trusted. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 12:33,17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * What sort of reasonable decisions has he questioned? --Raidarr (talk) 20:02, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You've seen Bukkit lecture some of Qualitipedia's policies, right? Two of them, in fact. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 7:11, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Qualitipedia policies are mostly unorthodox, and is in need of some sort of remedy. Also, I recall only questioning the admin reversion "policy". If you could tell me which other policy, that'll be great. -- Cheers, Justin Aves (talk • contribs • global • rights) 03:16, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You think the rule against users undoing admins' edits is bad, even thoughs it's been commonly used by other admins over the years, and you defend the use of gibberish, especially in comments or usernames, and like Raidarr said, stuff like that can lead to suspicion and accusations of trolling. I don't know why you and I don't get along, and I didn't even want it to be that way but it seems to me that you do for whatever reason. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 9:51, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Not only that, but you falsely accuse me of abusing my admin powers like page simplifaction or removing the NSFW template from TTSW, when in all reality, I was a bit clueless, and didn't know that I'd been doing more harm than good. The NSFW template deletion was somewhat justified though. Plus, I listened to the feedback of people disapproving of my page simplification and I stopped. I listen to feedback, because I can take constructive criticism, you know. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 9:57, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Never defended the use of gibberish in anything other than usernames. To assume that people with gibberish usernames are trolls is assumption of bad-faith for something as minor as a username like “Isjsdjsd”. Also, I don’t dislike you, I don’t want to be on bad-terms with any users; I find you as a pretty chill dude. -- Bukkit  [ citation needed ] 19:44, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Just because you have had some disagreements with Bukkit doesn't mean they would be a bad bureaucrat, and the NSFW template deletion clearly needed consensus. Also, as for "defending the use of gibberish," a gibberish username isn't necessarily a problem. FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 05:40, 18 August 2022 (UTC)