Requests for Comment/Restore and archive Fandom leftovers

So anyway, when these wikis migrated to Miraheze, there were multiple Fandom leftovers, such as comments on pages and blogs, old threads, and blog posts. However, instead of archiving them in some way, the administrators deleted the Fandom leftovers. In my opinion, however, these should be restored and archived. I know that this seems like a pointless change, but these could be used for future reference. In addition, users may want to keep their blog posts. In terms for how we are going to do this, I have plans for each type of leftover:
 * 1) Comments can be archived in a mini-section with three =s ( === ) in the "Comments" section titled "Archived comments" which is coded like a talk page. In case you're wondering what this means, it will be coded like this:

Archived comments
[insert comment here] [insert username here] ([insert username here]) [insert time here], [insert date here] (UTC)
 * [insert reply here] with the other coding being the same as above

[insert comment here] with the other coding being the same as above
 * 1) Old messages and threads will be archived in a non-flow subpage of the user's talk page, with the name User talk:[insert username here]/Original talk archive. In terms for how it will be coded, it will be coded like this:

[insert title of discussion here]
[insert message here] [insert username here] (talk) [insert time here], [insert date here] (UTC)
 * [insert reply here] with the other coding being the same as above

[insert title of discussion here]
Same coding as above In terms for how this is going to be done, the administrators should look at the deletion logs of all of the wikis that were originally on Fandom (which are all of the wikis except for the Music wikis, MLW and FWW, and also DLW doesn't need to be looked at because only the namespace pages were imported (unfortunately)) and restore pages that were deleted for being Fandom leftovers. I know that restoring and archiving these will take a long time, but I'm not necessarily requiring them to be restored and archived ASAP. In addition, when they get restored, there will be a lot of users who can help archive them. FatBurn0000 (talk) 09:11, 25 November 2021 (UTC) Update: I'm not sure if you can make non-flow talk pages on wikis that have enabled flow (unless they were there before flow was enabled) so another idea may have to be considered. FatBurn0000 (talk) 09:18, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Blog posts will be renamed to fit Miraheze's style of blogs: Rather than being User blog:[insert username here]/[insert blog name here], it will just be Blog:[insert blog name here]. In addition, they will also have other things Miraheze blog posts have, such as the voting, the text starter , the comments , the "Articles by user [insert username here]" category ( ] ) and the no edit section.

Support
TBA

Oppose

 * I like the novelty of the idea for record keeping, but given other things that can be done and the slog of making this idea happen, I think it's a waste of time. If someone really wants to do this as an admin I think they're free to do so now, and it shouldn't be mandated for them to have this as part of their duties given they are only volunteers with limited skills, resources and interest. Were you to request adminship and do this yourself, I'd wish you well. There's just not enough 'free time' interest or really leadership I think to do this justice. But I defer if other users, especially admins see differently. --Raidarr (talk) 13:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) as while the idea of archiving things of old may be an interesting endeavor, it may be too much for the admins to focus on in tandem with their duties on the wikis given how much effort would need to go into it. Though like Raidarr said, if it really isn't too much for the admins then by all means go ahead. Marxo Grouch  (talk) 16:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The only thing worth saving are the user blogs, which are still around. Everything else was mostly just comments/messages that no longer have context, or empty user pages. --Blazikeye535 (talk) 16:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, well, can we at least save the blogs? FatBurn0000 (talk) 21:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * They're still around like I said, mostly on AGW. Did you not read my entire post? --Blazikeye535 (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * @Blazikeye535: FatBurn0000 (talk) 07:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm fairly confident that some of them were deleted instead of kept. See this for an example. FatBurn0000 (talk) 21:29, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * From what i can tell, a good portion of those old blogs that were deleted were redundant announcements or questions, but I’ll go through them anyways and see if they’re worth restoring or not. —Blazikeye535 (talk) 21:15, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, I just checked, the only ones that I believe were worth restoring were already restored and moved to the proper blog namespace. —Blazikeye535 (talk) 21:37, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 1)  None of us wants this. King Dice (talk) 22:16, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) There really isn't much use for this, and as mentioned above, some of these archives would be out of place or not be of any use anymore. Wing Commander confed star.pngTigerBlazer  23:35, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 3)  seems like too much work for the admins with not much contribution. Unless there were some noteworthy conversations. ᗩTOᗰIᑕᔕTᗩᖇ 💬 ⌨ 02:28, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 4)  Seems unnecessary. --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) 11:40, 6 December 2021 (UTC)